Itās not the best entry record given the latest rules. Itās going to be purely down to the IO you get and the answers you can give. Iād have all your info to hand, such as accommodation and return ticket ready for inspection. Maybe getting vip fast-track āmightā be something to consider, canāt do any harm. If you have a girlfriend here, Iād make that the MAIN reason for your frequent visits. If you can, show them proof that your type of employment means you āhaveā to leave on a certain date. Good luck.
Jomtien better than Phuket? Ha ha ok bud yes your opinion but fuck me, do you actually swim in that water there??? Thereās more bars in the general Pattaya area but the quality is here in every sense. I go to Pattaya about 4 times a year as have mates over that way. I do enjoy my time there but was shocked at how quiet itās progressively getting. Indians have totally taken over and the place is filthy as fuck. Yeah for a beer and cheap full English (why leave UK) itās great but generally, Phuket is paradise compared. All the best. š
⢠Role in Thailand: Functions as an insurance broker/group, not a direct insurer. It uses Assist International Services (AIS) as a local contact point and claims management service in Bangkok, Thailand.
Ownership/Partners (Designated Members)
The company is an LLP, and the current active Designated Members are:
⢠Patrick Michel Lorentz: Country of Residence: Cambodia
⢠Ashish Sharma: Country of Residence: India
Note: Several Thai nationals, including those associated with Assist International Services, were previously LLP Members but have since resigned.
Business Model
⢠Model: Described as a āParticipative International Medical Insuranceā and ācustomer-owned, and ethical company.ā
⢠Mechanism: Operates on a āparticipative community philosophy where members are co-owners with real shares.ā
⢠Licensing: Holds one insurance license and one broker license (according to one source). Another source states it is a UK broker unlicensed in Thailand.
Negative Feedback and Claim Payout Concerns
⢠Allegations: Serious allegations exist, including that WRLife is āeffectively a Ponzi scheme,ā a ānothing shelf company in the UK with zero financial backing and no underwriter.ā
⢠Claim Payouts:
⦠Positive Feedback: Some Trustpilot reviews praise quick claim processing and good service.
⦠Negative Feedback: Other reviews and forum discussions (e.g., AseanNow, Facebook groups) report āexcuses for not paying claims in full,ā ālack of communication,ā and general warnings against the company.
⦠Regulatory Concern: The fact that it is a UK-registered LLP and a broker (not an insurer) in Thailand, with payments sometimes directed to a local service provider (AIS), raises questions about its regulatory oversight and financial backing for large claims.
⦠Financial Stability: The āparticipativeā model and the lack of a clear, major underwriter are the core of the financial stability and claim payout concerns. The model is questioned as to what happens when a large number of claims are made.