Possibly, but I don't think so. In my opinion, maybe it is the fact you need a long term visa for the 5 year DL, and the DTV is only 180 days per entry so less than a year that normally given for other longer term visas despite the fact the validity is 5 years. Buuuut I really don't know just my speculation.
I renewed my 2 year DL for the 2nd time on my DTV and was only given 2 years. I asked why I can't get 5 years and she just said she doesn't know, its just the way it is. First application and first renewal were both on tourist visa at that time. Chonburi office.
Yes exactly this Sandi, but aren't you doing this tho by saying anyone with money is privileged without knowing their past experiences and sacrifices to get there? 🤔
Yeah BKK is annoying for this. Had this problem trying to get Residence Certificate for buying new bike. Instead I came to Pattaya where it is super easy and can get on shorter term visa. I think in Chiang Mai as well you don't need long term visa.
I would argue that having to deal with an extension every year is a disadvantage. You have to by physically in Thailand during a particular window every year or your visa will lapse. Also, you have to pay for that extension. Where as pay once and don't worry about it for several years. I travel a lot so leaving every six months is no problem. However, someone not leaving the country often, then I guess you are right and the retirement visa is advantageous as you can just stay in country indefinitely.