I do the exact same timings. The single entry O, from the London Embassy, worked for me with 90 day stints in Thailand. I tried to be smart and get a multi O-A to save on applications but the insurance requirement will put paid to that.

The London Embassy told me that I could use 90 day travel insurance, until my O-A expires. Then I would need to get an O.

@Robert ******

With hindsight, what you say makes sense. However, when I bought my O-A, there was no mention of health insurance being required. Previously, I used a Non O which involved a separate application every time I wanted to come to Thailand for 90 days. The O-A offered a means of only applying every two years, for an unlimited number of trips, which made sense at the time. What does not make sense is buying an annual health insurance for a 90 day trip, when travel insurance provides adequate medical coverage for 90 days. What the Embassy are suggesting is a way of getting by until my O-A expires and I can then apply for a Non O again.

@Bobby *******

The London Embassy seemed to say that travel insurance would be ok for 90 days. I specifically asked about that.

@James *******

My plan would be to return to UK and apply for a Non O, once my O-A can no longer be used.

Very encouraging news....😊

Great news! Let's hope it catches on...

@Tod ********

Point taken. I'll wait a bit and see what happens. I was just trying to stay one step ahead.

Surely, it's sensible to simply have your insurance details to hand. It does not make sense to travel without insurance anyway.

I suppose we should eventually, be prepared for a similar change when a second application is submitted at the UK Embassy. Is the writing on the wall?