@Thailand ***************************************
Thank you for this clarification. It is counter-intuitive though. The way you describe one can stay an additional 90 days in the Kingdom, but starting with 30 days and adding 60 after. I would expect the opposite, mostly in order to reduce work load on Immigration staff (though it does allow tighter control of foreigners in the country - perhaps a good thing).
I will now read further to see what is the difference in cost (per day) between the non-visa visa extension (or perhaps we get an actual visa this time rather than visa exemption?) versus the cannot travel extension. Versus leaving Thailand.
Also I must learn how much is discretionary. Only then can I decide (based on whether India, Cambodia, Nepal and Vietnam continue/open) whether to stay and for how long.
Seems rather complicated and tentative. But an uncertain cool season in ASEAN country for me is better than a certain cold season in the Canadian prairies. So I am not going to complain.
I wish the government and people of all countries success in maneuvering between public health and economic needs.