@Paula *******

When they have to work for free for spplicants not checking their own details, fees would go up for all applicants. When you submit an application it is not possible to change it anymore. Why should that be unfair?

@John *********

of course, the 500K is requirement for all DTV types.

The trading might only count as remote job if conditions are met.

When you do this as a remote job for a company or clients it should be possible.

Anonieme deelnemer 581 it might be what you meant to say, bu your reaction on my post that there is no relation with the lost bankbook and the trip to AIS, gave me the impression that you saw there was a relation.

@Christopher **********

you loose the visa fee because of not fully checking your application. Most embassies warn for this. The system does not have a known error, it just could be designed better.

Yes you have to do it.

First time of each stay in the country needs to be in person.

When you fly out before 90 days after first report, no second reporting needed.

When you did first report before day 90, then you need second reporting.

You need passport, copy of personal details passport, copy of visa stamp, copy of visa and TM30.

Some offices might not need everything.

Anonieme deelnemer 581 The AIS receipt was needed anyway to proof name and address of bank account number match with name and address of phone number because that now is needed to use the app as a security measure for Thai banks.

@Craig ******

This is not a new measure they take, it is already going on for quite a while. My gf had to arrange this already in January.

It is for all Thai bank accounts.

Did you miss it or were you the whole time in Europe?

Anonieme deelnemer 517 The trip to AIS is not related to the missing bank book I think, or am I missing something?

Anonieme deelnemer I am not making fun about other peoples mistakes, if you read all my posts in this topic, you would see it is my opinion they designed the system wrong. It should not be possible to enter data before scanning, getting it overwritten, and after scanning you should get a message that you have to check and correct the scanned data. Making an option to correct after submitting does not really make sense. What should people make aware they might check their data again? And what would be possible to change in that case? All data? Or just scanned data?