I agree it’s created for tourism, but you can’t be a tourist 365 days a year, because you become a tax resident after 180 days. It is highly recommended and generally considered the proper approach to switch from using visa exemptions to obtaining a proper long-stay visa above that period of time. Definitely not advised to do runs if you’re staying more than 180 days in a single year.
„he was entered on visa exemption quite often this year”, so you’re saying that it’s fine for a visa exemption to be a proper way in this case. Visa exemption is created for short time travellers, not for long-term or many-times visitors.
nope 65,000 per month is not a sole requirement. You have other options such as a deposit. If the post’s author doesn’t have a 65,000 income they don’t need it and can live here off of less.
pathetic is that I need to repeat that it’s not visa on arrival, with wasn’t even the point in my post, and that it was just wording, which I already corrected. Yes Sir Lynette it’s not visa on arrival I’ve genuinely tried to answer that they don’t need a visa then used wrong wording in my post saying “arrival” twice which should already trigger something in you instead of you happy trolling users that do mistakes while writing. You happy?