@David *******
Since your first reply to my comment (that you deleted) was that I had made assumptions (an obvious go-to when questioned, in my case not applicable) your answer here is less obvious than you would like to portray, and certainly much less credible. I’ll bow out, because I have now slid more to the disbelief side of the fence. Everything you wrote in your original post is part and parcel to what any reader thinks, or why would you write it? Your answer is disingenuous. Good luck, anyway; I do wish you well. AND I hope my disbelief is wrong.