@Jeff ******

Nobody will, and you know it. 😉

@Greg ********

You get conflicting answers because many answer from their own perspective. Having a tax liability is a very personal thing and entirely depends on your personal circumstances.

I see to often that people ask a tax related question without giving information and then many jump the keyboard to give conclusive answers.

We have a special group on Thai Tax Rules where we try to avoid / correct such answers. 1800+ members including a few Thai tax lawyers.

Click here: /

Oh, such a smart analysis. 👍

Also there were two type of responders: Male and female

There were two type of answers: With spelling errors and without spelling errors.

Are you a financial analyst for DT? 🤣

@Nick ***********

Wrong. Everybody says the same: When you’re 180 days or more within a calendar year in Thailand then you are Thai tax resident, which is the full and complete answer to the remark / question of the O.P.

So.. Again… What confusion?

@Tyler ******

there are security upgrades at several Thai banks. The other banks will follow so the whole thing will be finished within a few weeks.

@Richard *******

Works fine with THB.

@Ryan ******

Who taught you to become so rude?

@Paul *******

Irrelevant to the O.P.’s question then. Did you see the “without a visa” mention?

@Elías *******

Try to understand the comment. Bringing in money on a mule has no relevance to taxes or breaking the law.

Considering whether or not “they” can trace it, is nothing other than a consideration to break the law.

I’m sure your brain is able to process the difference.

@Elías *******

Re bringing in money on a mule: “They wouldn’t know when you commit customs fraud and tax fraud.” Are you advocating breaking the law?

Since your tax liability is based on self-assessment, whether or not “they” can see it is irrelevant, just like having a Thai bank account is completely irrelevant, unless you intend to break the law.