When someone has a logical story, I might just accept it. When I am not sure I might ask additional info or sources, but that is different from asking proof. And in this case it should be of no interest, because it is clear these checks can be done, but for us it makes no difference.
Anonieme deelnemer 747 Also don't forget, apart from the own financial requirement for the partner, the partner also needs to comply to other requirements because it cannot be a dependant visa.
Maybe there are no ongoing checks, but MFA confirms all visa requirements are valid on every entry, the immigration office I asked also confirmed this, so where did you get this different info that is publushed nowhere and you keep spreading without any proof?
Alex Ni I think you underestimate what access immigration can have, but apart from that, you shoud not advise here for illegal bypassing requirements, see the group rules.
When you really believe borderruns are something made on purpose discission is useless. Banks also see it not as long yerm visa, DLT does not see it as long term visa, Visa agents don't see it as long term visa, Googl AI does not see it as a long term visa. MFA classifies it as a tourist visa with a stay of 180 days what can be extended once with 180 extra days, so less than a year, which generally is not classified as long term. But when you are convinced it is long term, just keep thinking that way, all up to you. But I am talking about Thailand, and you are talking about thialand, maybe that causes the different opinion.