Well, since ACS no longer notarizes income letters,seems money in the bank is all there is, regardless of whether it’s marriage or retirement. Meaning, 90-day tourist visa may be my only option.
I mentioned the switch as a stepping stone to whether the same requirement applies to the marriage visa.
My problem is that my Bangkok Bank account of 20 years is a joint account. My family & I plan to return next summer from the U.S. But I have to be there to open a new, my-name-only account, meaning a bit of a headache wrt time. Best I can do is come on a 90-day tourist visa, open a new account, transfer 800k from joint account, extend visa at 60-day point, & then apply for non-O once my money has sat for the minimum two months. Seems it’d be easier & quicker to just go marriage visa IF there’s no two-months prior rule to deal with. Later, I, or as arbitrarily happened to me in the past, a Thai immigration officer can always change my type of visa to retired.
You’re correct, I’m confused. It has been my understanding that you do not need to provide income verification if you meet the requirements associated with 800k in the bank. Seems a bit redundant.
I agree, but there are two drawbacks to the retirement visa that I can think of: you cannot get a worker’s permit & you cannot accumulate time toward citizenship, if you’re so inclined to either.
Do you have any friends who regular Thai see as higher cast? Such as a policeman or teacher? When I opened my first Bangkok Bank account in early 2004, I was on a 60-day tourist visa. A Thai friend of mine, a pilot with Thai International, came with me, & spoke directly to the bank manager. Perhaps a half hour later, I had my bank book.
A couple of years ago, my family & I thought we’d be returning to the LoS. So we bought two new iPhones & subsequently got them unlocked so we could replace the sims after the move. iPhones typically cost two to three times more in Thailand than in the U.S.