This is NOT an official government website. We are an independent resource providing information and assistance to travelers.
Kim ********
This is a summary of
Kim ********
's contributions to the platform. They have posed 8 questions and added 778 comments.

QUESTIONS

COMMENTS

Kim *********
@Brandon ***********
strange because the purpose is to verify that the couple actually live together and that has nothing to do with retirement extension
Kim *********
@Nigel *************
it's only for marriage they want to make sure we live together
Kim *********
@David **********
interesting. However embassies and immigration are two completely different authorities
Kim *********
@David **********
the allowed period with extension is always irrelevant to the airlines. It's the length of the initial permission to stay that counts.
Kim *********
@Robbie *****
impossible to say if this is an issue for you since it is the airline that can - and do sometimes - deny boarding. Some airlines are strict and some are not.
Kim *********
@David **********
the whole point of buying a ticket is to show proof of onward travel before or at the end of the allowed period of staying so of course it is 60 days
Kim *********
@Ellie ******
oh - but usually no requirement for insurance on a non-o based on retirement or have I misunderstood something?
Kim *********
@Nongnuch *******
really? and what would the agent do? take the exam for him? that's illegal