they may be using it as an excuse, you're the idiot repeating it. What has airbnb got to do with whether someone enters visa exempt for 60 or 30 days and someone who enters on a 60 day tourist visa? Zilch. My initial reply was to you saying people staying longer have been using illegal airbnb. Implying long term stays on airbnb are illegal. I was pointing out that airbnb itself is not illegal. That doesn't change if visa exempt goes from 60 days to 30 days. 🤷♂️
🤣 I find it amusing that you call someone an idiot while being idiotic. Do you think someone cannot legally rent a condo using airbnb if the visa exempt changes from 60 to 30 days when it is still legal to rent for 30 days? Makes zero difference
I interpreted based on your language using the term "many of those staying longer", so not implying to short term rentals. But ultimately 60 day visa exempt going to 30 day visa exempt leaves your comment about airbnb totally irrelevant considering airbnb can still be used 🤣🤣
airbnb has nothing to do with visas 🤷♂️ Plus a 30 day entry visa exempt is not a visa. Plus, you could rent an airbnb for 30 days and enter visa exempt for 30 days
the way I read it was that, in general, airbnb accommodation is illegal as nothing was specified to differentiate between illegal and legal airbnb rentals. And when you use the term "many of those staying longer.." does imply longer term rentals.And considering the post is about changing the visa exempt from 60 days back to 30 days, I really struggle to understand your initial point. Whether it's 60 days or 30 days, airbnb can be used. 🤷♂️ Jesus continues to weep 🤣🤣