I 100% agree. "Seek the advice of a Thai solicitor"
As you mentioned, "Thai courts are obligated to follow the law" Which also implies; Thai law will take precedence over any foreign state laws when the individual in question is a Thai national.
The same principle applies to us when we travel overseas.
For example, if one were to engage in pedo shit in a country where such acts might not be explicitly illegal, however... there are still significant consequences.
If Australia becomes aware of these actions and we return to Aus, we would likely face prosecution & imprisonment even if a foreign court acquitted the person. Your own nation retains the right to prosecute or protect you as they see fit.
*Many nations have strong double jeopardy laws, but this is often irrelevant if they deem the crime too serious & your a risk to society.
, if you lack an understanding of how the legal system works, you should refrain from commenting. It is disrespectful, especially considering the seriousness of the situation.
I outlined the specific Thai laws governing this matter, provided links to legal resources in Thailand, and detailed six scenarios illustrating what could go wrong.
Tldr:
The wife can file a baseless petition and have the father & childs passport seized while a court case is pending.
If the Thai court has not been properly informed, they retain the right to:
1.) Protect their own Thai national, "the child."
2.) Review the information & ensure that, from their perspective, the child’s best interests are fully considered.
One argument could be that the family’s current instability due to the child being separated from the mother necessitates prioritising the child’s stability, which may involve remaining with the mother.
Scroll up if you would like to read my full detailed explanation and analysis.
We see and hear situations all the time, with the police and legal systems around the world. The individual who contacts the police first and provides the most information is often the one believed.
Therefore, it is advisable to ensure that all relevant facts are documented in Thailand while the child is still a minor, to mitigate the risk of any retaliatory action by the mother.
I presume David has a strong and clear case; however, individuals can still cause significant difficulties by filing a petition in court before your side has been heard. It is, therefore, prudent to present your case to a Thai famliy law firm, in order to pre-emptively safeguard against such scenarios.
The Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) and the Child Protection Act require that custody decisions be made with the child's welfare as the primary consideration.
Example:
If the mother presents evidence that the father is unfit (e.g., due to neglect, abuse, or substance misuse), the Thai court may reassess custody arrangements, regardless of existing foreign rulings.
Thai National Priority:
If the child is a Thai national, protecting their welfare within Thailand becomes the court's responsibility.
===== Scenarios Where Thai Courts can assert their jurisdiction =====
1.) Welfare Concerns about the fathers Care
Even if claims are fabricated, the legal process could result in delays and require the father to address them in court. (Thai Court has the power to seize passports during proceedings)
Suggested Action:
Pre-emptively consult a Thai law firm before travelling to ensure proper documentation is provided to Thai authorities.
2.)Parental Rights Violation:
The mother could argue that her parental rights were violated in the UK, appealing to Thai courts for custody reassessment.
3.)Jurisdiction Over The Thai Nationals:
If the child spends extended periods in Thailand, Thai courts may assert primary jurisdiction. Foreign rulings can be deemed irrelevant.
4.) Non-Participation in Hague Convention:
- Thailand is not a signatory to the Hague Convention. (and many other international legal agreements)
- The mother can initiate a case if she can prove shared custody or that the child was removed without her consent.
5.) Equal Parental Rights Under Thai Law:
The mother can argue she was deprived of her legal rights as a parent.
6.) Emergency Custody Petitions:
Filing an emergency petition highlighting the above arguments could lead to immediate restrictions, such as surrendering passports and imposing travel bans.
These are the two dominant legal Frameworks Governing this scenario:
1. Civil and Commercial Code (CCC), Book V, Title II (Family Law):
Governs parental power, custody, and child welfare provisions.
2. Child Protection Act B.E. 2546 (2003):
Aims to safeguard children, particularly those at risk of abuse or neglect.
Both laws relate to child custody cases involving Thai nationals. They emphasise the child's best interests, which take precedence over rulings from foreign jurisdictions.
Are you stating it's bullshit that the Thai court has the ability to override a foreign ruling?
Or are you expressing disbelief because you are unfamiliar with Thai laws or have not read them?
I implore you to refrain from making unhelpful comments, especially during a serious matter. Dismissing these concerns with disrespect undermines the gravity David's situation and fails to acknowledge Thailand's rigorous approach to family law and child protection. Thai courts prioritise the welfare of Thai nationals, regardless of foreign rulings.
I'll go through the laws & cite the codes, laws & scenarios which can be played out below.