You are totally free to believe whatever you want, but I choose to believe whatever is factual. This 90-days nonsense gets thrown around in these groups all the time. Here's a policy for Thai insurance through AXA - one of the biggest. This policy mentions NOTHING about IDPs. So who do I choose to believe. A properly referenced reliable source or Gregor Huettner who cannot back up anything he is saying. I know who I'll go with 👍👍👍
There's nowhere in Thai Traffic Law which states 90 days. This is an internet myth. Thai Law states "temporary visitor" - so anyone on a tourism based visa
Actually you're wrong, but I'm not going to argue. I'll just politely request you show me where in Thailand Traffic Law there is a 90-day stipulation. The international treaty is definitely 12 months
Not really. Insurance companies look only at the licence, not the IDP. I was with Allianz for over twenty years as an investigator (yeah I was one of those asses who denied claims!), and no insurance claim was ever denied because of IDP issues. The biggest problem in Thailand (and Indonesia) was people riding small motorcycles on car licences (because some countries allow this in their country). These were always denied.