Brown *******
This is a summary of
Brown *******
's contributions to the platform. They have posed 4 questions and added 415 comments.

QUESTIONS

COMMENTS

Brown ********
@Brandon ***********
shouldnt be but its becoming common the poipet immigration are making up their own rules from what im hearing. i have to do 2 border runs to cambodia and im going to avoid that border like a plague
Brown ********
hes well within the rules but apparently the poipet immigration are turning people away even when they are within the rules and the fact hes been there on 2 visa exempt stamps and 1 land crossing already he maybe in the shi+ so maybe he should try another border to be safe
Brown ********
@Graham *****
yes ive been told they are refusing people back into pattaya forno legit reason. be nice to know why they are doing it
Brown ********
@Adelina ********
yep. I was misinformed by my property manager when I went to do 90 days reporting and the immigration slammed me with a 1600 baht fine. It's just a rule to extort money from farang as far as I'm concerned
Brown ********
@Lee ******
then your safest bet is to just buy one of those flight itinerarues online and state your departure date as the same. Safer bet because while visa agents can get you retirement visas without the 800k, it's still the requirement
Brown ********
@Lee ******
it is usually a requirement to show an itinerary in and out. There are sights online where you can pay a small amount of money to issue you with a flight you are not going to take. This should work ok
Brown ********
I just got a 60 day despite my flights being 150 days apart. I simply explained I was going to do the 30 day extension and 2 border runs to Cambodia and they accepted it. So I think if you submitted your intention to convert to a retirement visa they may accept this. The only issue might be requiring 800k bank statement
Brown ********
@Adelina ********
unfortunately landlords aren't the ones who cop the actual fine even though immigration say it's the landlord's responsibility. It's a rule based to scam people if you ask me. If it was legit they'd send a fine to the landlord as apposed to taking money from the tenant and telling them to get reimbursed by the landlord