I have been in thailand for 13yrs on an OA visa. I would strongly recommend an O visa as an alternative. An OA visa requires mandatory health insurance ( both in & out patient) at a level set by the gov which can be subject to yearly change...only upwards of course. The O visa has no health insurance demands but of course you can still secure a policy to suit your needs, not the government's
I've been living permanately here for 12 yrs on a OA...perhaps averaging one overseas return trip annually. I will be swapping to an O when my current visa is up for extension. I have the 800k & have had health insurance for the duration of my stay.Long before it became compulsory, currently complying with the
*****
********
k requirement. I plan to retain this policy as i find it offers peace of mind as I age. I am not prepared to pay for the 3m tbh plus policy as i find the amount of cover & policy cost excessive. Therfore i will be hopefully transferring to a non O.
each to their own opinion...l'm not a well-heeled englishman who would be regularly returning to your homeland on multi entry visas.My initial comment was referring to retirees looking to SETTLE in thailand on a OA visa Just for your info a non O visa allows you to enjoy the benefits you enjoy without purchasing any annual health insurance.