I'm well aware but that was my original point. Questioning whether the tax residency is the reason they would not allow entry. It would make sense not to allow in if it's over 180 days in a financial year as you then can't be on a tourist visa. I regret bringing this up it seems people fail to use their brain to connect dots.
As you can't really be a tourist if over 180 days triggering being a tax resident. So would want you on a different visa. My thoughts on how it works anyway
yeah that's what I'm curious on. Back to back but in the new financial year. I understand at their discretion but I am thinking the concern is more going over 180 days in a tax year Jan-Dec which triggers you being a local tax resident. But if you don't go over 180 in a financial year perhaps they don't care.