@Jim *******
I know this might sound strange, but i genuinely care about other people than myself.
This isn't trolling comment. If you have a different view point, I am genuinely interested in hearing it.
Let me give a real example, but change the names.
Tepa is from Pakistan, a much poorer country than Thailand. He has worked and lived in Thailand for 10 years. Paid his taxes and through his contributions paid the social taxes that pay directly for the hospitals.
Blake is from the UK. He worked for one of the largest financial companies in the world. He has never lived, worked, or pay taxes in Thailand. He came here on an extended trip for several months. Blake mom was thai, so he was very easily able to get a national id card and become thai.
If tepa and Blake both broke their arms, went to the same hospital, got the same care, tepa would have to pay more than Blake. Even though Blake is richer, doesn't live or work or pay taxes here. Blake treatment is partially paid by that the tax contributions from tepa job.
Do you believe that tepa and Blake are both paying there fairshare and why?
I believe the a more fair system would take something other strictly nationality into consideration. Using a residency based system is both reasonable and customary and would align itself with the UN civil rights treaties Thailand has ratified.