@Ivan ***********

That's if you're solely a tax resident of Thailand. However, for dual tax residents you can use the formula in the DTA to ensure tax residency (and tax laws) remains with the country paying the pension, which means it is not taxable in Thailand

@Christopher ************

And what does that tell you? Hey, I can help you. Go and see one of your buddies at this place and hand over 3500 baht. They'll get you the number that you so desperately crave! 😂😂😂

@John *********

I'm not misleading anyone. Each individual should check their own DTA. Can you not read this? Which part of "taxable only in that state" can't you understand?

@John *********

There's a dozen "tax experts" touting for business in these groups who are misleading people. Perhaps you should start telling them to pull back on their misleading advice?

@Charles *******

Yes you need to read the DTA applicable to your country. I have dual tax residency and the DTA provides a "test" to determine which country prevails. I have closer economic and personal ties with Australia plus a permanent place of residence in Australia, so Australia is the only country where my pension is taxable

@Christopher ************

I recommend Thailand Revenue.

@John *********

That's UK, but there's a lot more countries in the world

@Ekkehard ******

Correct. But it's still possible for a person to be a tax resident of two countries and the DTA would determine which country's tax takes precedence.

@Charles *******

There's a lot more to residency than how much time is spent in the country. In Australia for example it's more to do with having a permanent abode and family/financial ties than it is a simple number of days. If it was simply number of days, the mega rich would just spend four months in three different countries and avoid tax everywhere, so much more to it