is a better option that 1900? You cracking on about investments which have no relevance to my simple question. It's simple arithmetic.
*****
v 1900. You have no answer so you carry on about unrelated nonsense. I have a commercial property in Germany which nets me (after tax) approximately 18% on my original investment. But it has nothing to do with getting a visa so I don't mention it. Jesus!
If the poster gets a pension above the 65k threshold it's totally useful. Then he doesn't have to pay 25k under the table. You're going to tell me that financially he's still better off to do that, I can't for the life of me see it. I pay 1900 baht per year, and you're telling me that I'd be better off paying
*****
baht. We'll have to agree to disagree on that one, but I wouldn't be seeking you out for financial advice 👍
I don't quite see what my bank has to do with this! Never mind, you can't quite grasp the concept of getting an extension for 1900 baht. Try to control that temper of yours! If you could see through the haze of anger, you'd be able to read properly! Have a great day! 👍
Of course! Paying an agent must be better than getting an affidavit from my embassy! You're a bit out of your depth I think. But maybe the cheapos you're talking about never prepared for retirement? Heyho! Have a wonderful day! 👍👍✅✅
Or perhaps more intelligent and money- wise? Those retirees who were smart enough to prepare for retirement by investing in pensions don't need to pay agents 25,000 baht every year. I'd say it's those that didn't have the foresight who are the illiterates
You do realise it's always been that way in Thailand? 180 days per year deems a person a tax resident. It's been like that for at least 25 years. I'm still here and still paying no tax as I have no assessable income