You can only use as much as the cable cross-section, the cable length, the fuse and your electricity meter allow.

@Jan *****************

you are only stubborn 😅😅

@Jan *****************

now you got it.

But it's for sure not, because the airline misunderstands... that is an infantile view.

@Jan *****************

bullshit

@Jan *****************

false. It is not for every flight - but some of course, needed and so not in general formally required.

And then it could be any flight ticket and sometimes even bus. Don't spread bullshit.

@Jan *****************

you have two points and both are wrong.

You say onward ticket is anyhow a formal requirement in general at visa exempted entry. Which is false.

And you showed as proof the screenshot from the mfa, where they say, a round-trip ticket is required. Only?

Which is so far also false.

Because 1. it is not at every airline or always needed

and 2. if an airline demand it it could be any flight. Round, return and onward.

So your screenshot of the mfa is partly correct only.

But you claim even if it is not fully correct, that it is the regulation.

You contradict your own statements with this "proof". So your statements are false.

Or your proof is not worth so much as are your statements.

Your claim that always an onward ticket is required - is false.

There are flights where you don't need to show onward or round-trip or return tickets.

You can board without them.

So your claim that people must have that, is often wrong.

But I get meanwhile that you don't want to understand. You intend to stay stubborn.

your ridiculous "proof" actually contradicts your first statement.

You say onward is needed and mfa says round-trip.

Find the mistake.

@Jan *****************

this here is what you claimed and that is false. Full stop.

@Jan *****************

So mfa says it must be a round ticket?

That EXcludes an onward or exit ticket what YOU always talked about... and you don't see, how you refute yourself?

See how ridiculous it is? Don't you see the contradictions???

you dont use your brain and dont listen to experiences and want to be a strict believer against common sense OR you know it and try to argue around to be right. omg

But here we go 😄

You finally admit that there is no such regulation and so not always a requirement for that.

And you admit, that experience exists, that it is not always needed, and people can also travel in cases without that.

Nice. Thats all what i said from the beginning.

You slowly begin to understand.

So it can not be a general claim that it is always and everytime a requirement.

By all that, you finally know now, that your claim was in general false.

Lets name the facts again:

1. it can happen that SOME airlines demand an exit flight at the checkin counter and others not

2. even if they demand, it still can be changed by some reasons and you can then fly without

3. there is no official law or regulation making that an always requirement

4. it could happen, but rarely, that immigration officers ask for that at entry

5. it is always possible, if one comes into such a situation to buy cheap online an onward ticket to solve

6. for to get a visa such can be demanded

So the advise must be:

please check IF your airline demands an exit ticket for checkin or not.

please check IF your embassy demands that for to get a visa or not.

it's good to have, but not always necessary and can then save such efforts and money.

Your general statement was false.

@Jan *****************

i fly very often (30 - 60 times a year) and so know it.

Then there are so many pretenders same you, who "theoretically" know so much...

For example friends fly tommorow from Bali to Bangkok. Without any onward ticket and on visa exemption.😉

It is fact that some airlines ask for it.

It is also fact that some don't!

So your claim that it is formal is false, whatever you want to lie to yourself.

If you make false statements to others, you should be corrected.

My friends will not have spent money on an unnecessary onward ticket.

That is how to help.

Not with false statements.

But we both know, why you need to do that.

you are not able to admit when you're wrong and try to argue the facts away.

@Michael *******

don't know, where your comment refers to...