EnthusiasticCrocodile5147 he CAN, but he does not HAVE TO

Tom Attermann Henriksen YOU ARE COMPLETELY OFF TRACK . . . . . No, the house owner has ZERO obligations.

He would do them a favour, however he does NOT HAVE TO register the boyfriend, simply because he did not rent out the premises to the boyfriend. It is a matter of principles.

The house owner can theoretically REFUSE to do a TM30, he does not have to allow the presence of the boyfriend inside the rented-out premises.

@Alexis *****

no the girlfriend CANNOT do it without information from the landlord, his blue housebook and his Thai ID card

James Smith No, the house owner has ZERO obligations.

He would do them a favour, however he does NOT HAVE TO register the boyfriend, simply because he did not rent out the premises to the boyfriend. It is a matter of principles.

The house owner can theoretically REFUSE to do a TM30, he does not have to allow the presence of the boyfriend inside the rented-out premises.

Khun Philippe only IF the owner complies. Because the owner has ZERO obligations to do that

Antonino Amato complete and utter nonsense, the girlfriend has rented the apartment, she cannot do a TM30 by herself. And the 90-days report has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with a Tm30

Per Lund no! He "must" do nothing. He CAN, that's up to him. That boyfriend does not have a rental contract. The landlord does NOT HAVE TO register him

Darlene D Smit one more time because all these stupid comments about an alleged "obligation of the landlord to file a TMN30" are really annoying. . . . . . . I was mainly replying to the many many posters who incorrectly claim that the house owner MUST register the boyfriend.

No, the house owner has ZERO obligations.

He would do them a favour, however he does NOT HAVE TO register the boyfriend, simply because he did not rent out the premises to the boyfriend. It is a matter of principles.

The house owner can theoretically REFUSE to do a TM30, he does not have to allow the presence of the boyfriend inside the rented-out premises.

The house owner has ZERO obligations. He does NOT have to register the boyfriend per TM30 in his rented-out premises.

If he did so, that would just be a splendid FAVOUR. Just stop assuming that the girlfriend or boyfriend have any rights towards a TM30 registration.

So beware, keep humble and polite and ask the landlord to please register a TM30.

(which he does not need to do for the Thai girlfriend so I assume he might not even have registered the premises in the TM30 online system).

@John *********

I was mainly replying to the many many posters who write that the house owner MUST register the boyfriend. No, the house owner has ZERO obligations. He would do them a favour, however he does NOT HAVE TO register the boyfriend, simply because he did not rent out the premises to the boyfriend. It is a matter of principles

Per Lund the house owner is NOT responsible, the guy has not officially been accepted inside the premises by the owner. The landlord does not have any obligations to follow. The girlfriend must ask the owner to do them a favour, but the owner can fully legally refuse it