I have been led to believe that to apply for an O-A visa, you do not have to show evidence of funds? Just saw this on e- visa portal, which contradicts what I read previously:
Financial evidence showing monthly income of no less than 65,000 THB or having the current balance of 800,000 THB, e.g. bank statements, proof of earnings.
You should of worded it arriving visa exempt, which is thirty days, which as the experts say you can extend to give you sixty days. The moderator that replied to your initial query thought you were getting a visa before you travel.
If your from the UK, I researched, you can get an official letter posted to you & signed by a Government official at the DWP, confirming your annual state pension guarantee.
So if they won't accept a combination, why will they accept 12 monthly transfers of 65,000 THB., which incidentally isn't even 800,000 THB? 780,000 THB actually.
Why do all the expats keep saying that to get the none 'O' visa extension, the only way is by having 800k in a Thai bank account in your name? Do none of these experts not know that you can have a combination of money in your Thai bank account, plus pension paid into your Thai account, as long as the combination is at least 800k or more.
Seems the poor lady has been scammed. Someone says why did she get her passport returned if she'd been scammed. How did they pay the visa fee? If they paid some agent in cash, then an agent could just take all the paperwork given by them. Take the money, then bin all the paperwork and post the passport back to the lady concerned.