So I guess the only way to get back to the "trailing spouse" route, is to apply for a new visa in our home country. But this has other obstacles such as a mandatory insurance for a Non-O. We'll probably stick to this visa, but change the proof of finances next year to the 65.000/month method...
Yesterday, we went to CW for our extension of stay. The trailing spouse option was denied ☹️. The IO pointed to the mention of "retirement" on my wife's Non-O and said you cannot be "take care" on a retirement visa. So we had to go down the 800K route...
. It is just that I want to hear the refusal from the horse's mouth. A few years ago we started with a non-OA from outsite TH, and got the "trailing wife" solution for our extensions .I think it is weird to make a distiction between having a non-O in or out of the country. At least, I don't see the rational. Luckely my wife already has the 800.000.
I will be going to CW this week and try it out (non-O with financials for me and "trailing spouse"). We came in on a visa exempt, but the process should be the same.
Are the above rules, about the 800.000 and the 65.000 for an extension, the same for an incountry Non-O? I'm from one of the "embassy affidavit countries". Can I apply for a non-O at Chaeng Wattana with an affidavit attesting to a 65.000 THB income?
But I think I blurred the purpose of my question by adding that info on my personal situation. More in general: do you know if immigration in Bangkok allows purchasing a Non-O based on retirement?