Got you. Thanks Brandon

@Ellen ************

:) appreciated muchly!

Seems so, in which case a thousand apologies! In my defence, I had thought the end date of the visa would be reflected in the stamp and that would just be that. Fail to see the advantage in legitimately obtaining a 60 visa, if you’re travelling from a country that you’d have a 60 day exemption for anyway, if the same result is needing to leave the country, even if for what sounds like 24hrs+ tho

@Gar****

apologies for not having specified; it reflects a “Multiple Tourist TR”. Assuming this is the same as was suggested in the comments. It sounds as though I’ll still need to leave prior to the 60 days, if not extending by another 30 within Thailand. But overall, having 6 months, on the basis of leaving/returning(?)

That is a bonus point and I thank you for it. Wouldn’t you just extend, THEN leave and return though? Amassing more days?

@Ellen ************

fair point. Naive perhaps (obviously), but had thought that the VISA after having supplied all I had, which was subsequently accepted and waived through, had confirmed the “end date” on that basis.

@Declan *********

Jim Faulks apologies for not having specified; it reflects a “Multiple Tourist TR”. Assuming this is the same as you’d suggested (and the other helpful comments), it sounds as though I’ll still need to leave prior to the 60 days, if not extending by another 30 within Thailand. But overall, having 6 months, on the basis of leaving/returning. Thanks again

@Jim *******

apologies for not having specified; it reflects a “Multiple Tourist TR”. Assuming this is the same as you’d suggested (and the other helpful comments), it sounds as though I’ll still need to leave prior to the 60 days, if not extending by another 30 within Thailand. But overall, having 6 months, on the basis of leaving/returning. Thanks again