To get the most accurate answers, you should start by stating your passport/citizenship, and the visa you are currently on, and what you are trying to achieve and why. It will us all time, and money, and prevent people banging their heads against a wall continuously.

@Michael *******

yes, that's what i said, and that's why I corrected you.

"...applies to visas FOR a minimum of one year"

"...applies to visas OF a minimum of one year"

See the difference ?

"...only applies to visas FOR a minimum of one year". This suggests that 90 day reporting only applies to visas for a minimum of 1 year. That you will need to do 90 day reporting, on ANY and ALL long term visas, for at least the first one year of the visa, maybe more.

"...only applies to long term visas OF a minimum of one year". This says that only long term visas that are valid for a minimum period of one year require 90 day reporting. Any visas of a shorter duration do not require 90 day reporting. Which is what you've just experienced, which is why I try to explain the fine difference.

So what everyone was telling you was CORRECT and TRUE, for all visas requiring 90 day reporting.

But you've said "You are all wrong", like they are all idiots and you on your own have trumped them all.

@Michael *******

EVERYONE is wrong? EVERYONE who stays or lives in Thailand happily for years, without the need to ask for help with their visa/permit of stay IS WRONG ??

Or YOU have been trying to do a 90 day report on a visa that doesn't require 90 day reporting ??

And just to correct you further, 90 day reporting is required on long term visas that 'ARE' of a minimum of one year.

You said "only applies to long term visas 'FOR' a minimum of one year", which means something completely different.

I know English is not your first language, but these small details can make a big difference

@Alfred **********

have you done this before? Got 30 days instead of 90 and got it amended? A non 'o' is for 90 days - if you got 30days, then you are on visa exempt entry.

@Alfred **********

the post is about multiple entry TOURIST visa, not 'Non "o"'. As you dont state you have a non "o", My reply to you was on the assumption you had the same visa as on the post, as you compare your entry with the OP ? Why would you compare and quote your experience of entries and visa lengths of DIFFERENT visa ??? Although I have 'read' this is also the case with long term visas. And people have had to exit and re-enter to get the right visa. I may well be wrong about your non "o" visa, but I'm right about the OPs visa/situation.

@Cale ******

wrong. read other replies detailing 270 days maximum.

@Nigel **********

wrong. read other replies detailing 270 days maximum. What were you saying about living with mum and dad ??

@Bill *******

wrong. read other replies detailing 270 days maximum.

@Mehmet ********

read other replies detailing 270 days maximum.

@Martin ******

read other replies detailing 270 days maximum.