I'm well aware but that was my original point. Questioning whether the tax residency is the reason they would not allow entry. It would make sense not to allow in if it's over 180 days in a financial year as you then can't be on a tourist visa. I regret bringing this up it seems people fail to use their brain to connect dots.
As you can't really be a tourist if over 180 days triggering being a tax resident. So would want you on a different visa. My thoughts on how it works anyway