This is NOT an official government website. We are an independent resource providing information and assistance to travelers.
Roberto ********
This is a summary of
Roberto ********
's contributions to the platform. They have posed 6 questions and added 1555 comments.

QUESTIONS

COMMENTS

Roberto *********
@Gerry *******
I intend switching from non-O to DTV next year, because it's an ideal visa for retirees, with minimal requirements in comparison. I don't think there will be many overstayers on DTV. A simple border bounce gives another 180 days, so why would anyone risk it?
Roberto *********
@Colin ******
The difference would be so minimal the allowable deduction would cover it. Many people would only be transferring pensions which in most countries would be covered by the DTA as taxable only in the country of receipt
Roberto *********
@Gerry *******
I can't see it. Tens of thousands of retirees use visa agents who openly advertise their corrupt services. Nothing has ever been done by immigration to investigate these services. They're not going to pump man-hours into trying to unveil any "fraudulent" soft power or medical DTV when these people have been issued with a totally legitimate visa by an Embassy
Roberto *********
@Gerry *******
90-day report is just a confirmation of address. Its format hasn't ever changed and it applies equally to all visas, so extremely unlikely immigration will meddle with it. If anything, an in-country extension *might* need 500k funds showing in a Thai bank account, but all this will do is push people to use the border bounce facility
Roberto *********
@Gerry *******
For decades people have used agents to get retirement visas to by-pass requirements. These are the most abused visas in Thailand with some mugs paying
*****
+ baht for a dodgy visa. Immigration haven't ever "looked into" these scams, and no-one has "fallen foul of the system". If you think suddenly Immigration is going to get serious about the DTV you've got your eyes closed!
Roberto *********
@Dave ****
Exactly! The MFA sets foreign policy and hence visas. Immigration cannot interfere with the issuing of these visas
Roberto *********
@Greg ******
Totally agree. There's so many expats who seem against this visa, and yet it's exactly what foreigners have been demanding for years!
Roberto *********
@Dave ****
You do realise this visa was introduced to get people into the country by making longer-stay visits possible and much easier? Everyone entering the country is in some way adding to the economy, some obviously more than others, but working on the saturation theory it sure is working! Why on earth will they kill the Golden Goose? This visa is here to stay
Roberto *********
@Luit ****************
Only applies if you haven't paid tax elsewhere. You can't be taxed twice