Once the DTV visa is obtained, anybody has experience if the documents (e.g. bank balance etc) are checked again upon re entry or upon extension within Thailand ? Thank you
2,354
views
7
likes
75
all likes
36
replies
0
images
12
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
The conversation discusses whether documents related to the DTV visa, such as bank balance requirements, are re-checked upon re-entry or during visa extensions in Thailand. Users share mixed opinions, suggesting that re-entry checks are very unlikely, but it is probable that document verification may occur when applying for an extension. They note that while current experiences show no checks at re-entry, future changes to policy could occur, particularly regarding compliance with financial requirements.
Know more once 180 days pass - itโs possible the government would want to ensure 500k baht is maintained through the visa like others ie retirement & marriage class etc
Tore *********
Re-entry very unlikely. Ive entered a few times,
Extension, very likely. We will know very soon i think.
Dom *********
I'm interested to know too
Kelly ********
For sure
Alessandro *********
For extension is very very possible they require all documents again, there was a post yesterday by a user that did TM47 and asked the officer about it, just dig in the group, it's best to fly out and come back, avoid the extension to avoid complications.
of course, if you did your DTV legally there's no worry, but you are always at the mercy of the officer, since it's still new you never know if they want some extra document that was not needed at the embassy, since the documentation required it's still not standardised it's very possible that you may have provided 1 month bank statement because your embassy asked that, while during the extension may need 6 months, then you need to book another appointment and do all the procedure again.
Reply to
Alessandro *********
Reply
Sefton ********
So far no. Future no one knows. Anyone who claims they know is making it up.
I suspect some controls may happen but it seems more likely if and when they do extensions.
There is a sense that this is too good to be true in lasting 5 years. So maybe they seek control later, but I can think of no other multi entry visa where they reviewed eligibility over time on entry. Insurance being a small exception for OA but not really same.
David ********
Just seen this on another site. Good info
David ********
Iโm living in Chiang Mai with my wife and our four children, all on DTVs. 90 days for us is next Thursday. Online isnโt available for the first report, and I opted to try in-person to see if it was as easy as I had been told. It was. I asked another expat for advice and was told to take passports, TM30s, and completed TM47s. I also took a print-out of our house lease agreement but wasnโt asked to show it. I didnโt take passport photocopies. I got to the drive-up window not long before 1:00; it was closed for lunch between 12 and 1. Several minutes later the window opened, and I gave the officer the stack of six passports (with TM47s loose and TM30s attached inside each one). It took him about three minutes to process all six of them and issue printed receipts. Please note that this is my experience in Chiang Mai today; no guarantee that this will work exactly the same in other places or at a later date. Also: our passports are stamped through Feb. 19, but, because I went in a week early for 90-day reporting (you can do it between 15 days before and 7 after the 90-day mark), the receipts show that we need to report again 90 days from today (Feb. 11), not 90 days from the 90th day (Feb. 19). So, if one wants to schedule a 180-day border bounce very close to a visa stamp date, don't report ahead of the 90-day date like I did unless you want to report twice before leaving the country.
I've corresponded with some LTR holders. They're not necessarily the most eager to spend. It's a facade and that visa is a poor deal compared to what you can get by migrating to the USA with around the same investment.
Yes but that's because those earning US$40-80K or making large investments aren't going to be moaning on a forum like this all day.
With DTV applicants, or rather, potential applicants, some are looking at a simple method of staying in the Kingdom long term, without qualifying for another type of visa.
For some of these people, the DTV is suitable due to its relatively simple requirements.
Even so, it's not a walk in the park either and consulates are tightening up rules.
A 5-year visa "too good to be true"? Not really. It allows a 6 month per entry stay. Yes, that's longer than existing visas, but it's probably the way of the future. The LTR visa is an even better deal, but is that "too good to be true" as well? Hardly.
These DTV visas (and even the LTR ones for that matter) don't offer a pathway to residency. it's difficult to open a bank account on one.
There's a whole lot you can't do if you're on one...so it's hardly something to be envious of.
the LTR requires multi 100k USD investment in Thailand or large proven incomes. Both of which have a clear direct benefit to thailamd in attracting hnw individuals and big spenders.
The DTV visa posters seem to be stressed at the idea they might have to show 500k thb.
The ONLY likely check they might make at some borders upon re-entry is when someone is coming back after a quick 1 hour border run, having spent all their 180 days in Thailand with no time spent outside, at such borders as Ranong.
*****
Baht in cash may be requested in such cases, but certainly not your bank account details for instance. No one is going to be carrying around such documents to show in a long line of tourists, holding them up at a land border.
Otherwise, as you state, when you do an extension, then yes, they may ask for similar documents to the ones used to get the visa.
I'm wondering whether immigration will make up their own rules, such as needing to have 500,000 parked in a Thai bank account or for a minimum of 3 months in a foreign bank account and then using their own poor exchange rate try to deny your extension because according to them, your balance is only 498,560 Baht, whereas according to your exchange rate it's 501,450 Baht or something like that.
agree haven't seen anything like this. Just wait and time will tell. It seems ludicrous that the process would start again the visa is for 5 years once granted you don't have to reapply. It's like when you extend any visa passport and form pay fee bye bye
again don't believe everything you see here. It's a 90 day report you don't have to produce anything just your passport and a form actually l have never completed that form. 90 day report completely different to extension let's wait and not listen to heresay of a post that was obviously not proof of anything
wow its really hard to discuss with people here that dont believe anything. while this had nothing directly to do with a 90 day report and just asking the immigration about the requirements of a potential extension. if you dont believe people then why dont you move your a.. over to immigration and ask for yourself? people always expect that everything is beeing handed to them on a gold platter and when it is they wont even take it and start useless discussions. i find the info incredibly helpful and it prepares me for that might come. no one claims that 3 months away from a potential extension every single requirement is 100% clear. but it gives a good indication. and as of now it looks more like you have to proof everything again.
it doesn't tell you sh@#$t. Did he apply for an extension no have you no. I haven't it's kihe all the posts about you can't open a bank account people have. What is one person's asking experience is not a doing experience. As l said let's wait and see. Your just creating stress for yourself for no reason. When you go for your extension. With your passport and visa and completed extension form and 1900 bht we will see what comes of it ๐คฃ๐คฃ
he simply asked an immigration officer what would be required for extending in country. The officer replied that you'd have to again show financials and other documents and suggested briefly going out of the country was a better alternative.