When applying for TR visa , is it better to show the return flight for the 60 days that the visa allows
or for the 90 days that i intend to stay (including visa extension) ??
1,027
views
3
likes
29
all likes
12
replies
0
images
7
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
When applying for a TR visa in Thailand, it is advisable to indicate a return flight for the 60 days allowed by the visa rather than the 90 days you intend to stay. Based on shared experiences, applicants often receive requests for proof of exit within the initial visa duration. However, it may vary depending on the specific embassy or consulate handling your application.
when I applied for a visa I was asked how long my stay was and I entered 89 days and was then advised to apply for a 60 day visa, there was on the same page notification that the visa could be e tended to 90 days. I uploaded a 89 day return. Visa granted. COE applied for, granted.
Paul ***********
PS it is not a return that is needed but proof of onward travel POOT so a one way to say KL or a ticket where you loan a POOT can be used if they insist
I had my departure ticket for 89 days - they asked for 60 - so I bought a “cheap” one to KL as a disposable ticket. But my evisa is going through the LA consulate, they may be sticklers
yes. I had a ticket with the assumption that I would be getting the 30 day extension. The evisa didn’t care about that. I was pretty impressed with the fast response asking for a 60 day departure flight
Reply to
Kathy ********************
Reply
James ********
Yes...as you may be asked for it when you apply for the tourist visa ....
And again at check in for your flight and again on arrival in Thailand.
Suggest posting your question on this helpful forum to get others experiences.