I truly cannot understand why so many people continue to complain: “My bank account was closed,” or “I entered my full passport name yet my DTV visa was rejected or canceled.” If one approaches Thailand with such a negative mindset, perhaps it is better not to come at all. This country does not need individuals who carry only bitterness and discontent.

I have lived in Thailand for many years and I can state with certainty that the government’s priority is to safeguard its citizens. We must remember that we are merely guests here; we are neither permanent residents nor Thai nationals. Recent incidents of widespread call-center scams have caused countless Thai families to lose their savings. Even people close to me, including the parents of my Thai friends, were victims of these fraudulent schemes.

This is why, when I hear constant complaints such as “Why does Thailand keep changing the laws?” I see it differently. To me, it is a positive and necessary measure. Wrongdoers continually devise new methods to exploit the system, and in response the government must adapt its regulations. This is not about disregarding foreigners, but about prioritizing the protection of Thai citizens—which is precisely what every responsible government should do.

There is also a great deal of misinformation circulating. Instead of spreading complaints, I encourage people to read credible news sources such as the *Bangkok Post*. Not every account will be closed, and not every case is treated the same. Stop exaggerating. Perfection does not exist anywhere in the world.

I am originally from the United States, and even my country has its strengths and flaws, just as every nation does. If you wish to live in Thailand, you must accept reality with gratitude and maintain a positive attitude. Thailand is a paradise for those who respect it and embrace its way of life. However, if constant criticism is all you bring, then perhaps it is better that you do not come at all, as negativity only diminishes the experience for those who truly value being here.

Can anyone tell me if the ETA to thailand is going to start on 1st December or is it on hold.

Just heads up this may affect some people who dont have there phone numbers in there name has to match bank account.. It did me as wife had my account in her name to get the points. But changed over this evening.

No news when they will take action yet against accounts though. Usual Thai goverment lack of information.

Hello all!

The more I read, the more confused I get!

Let me briefly explain my situation: I arrived in Thailand from the US on November 29th with a 60-day TR visa that expires on January 27th.

I want to extend my stay longer than a one-time 30-day extension, but the longer Covid extension looks like it expires on January 25th , so am I out of luck or is everyone waiting to see if the Thai government extends the Covid extension?

And if the Thai government does reapply the Covid extension, do I need a Confirmation Letter from my embassy? Do I need to return to Bangkok for a Covid extension or can any immigration office take care of it?

I’m currently in Phitsanulok heading in the direction of Chiang Mai, but I would like to know if I need to go elsewhere to extend my visa, or should I just focus on a regular 30-day extension?

Thank you for helping to clarify this for me!

[members only]

What are the chances of this happening, do you think?

This article is a bit more balanced than other ones that have been flying around

Its clear that different Thai ministries have differing views on when things should reopen. Who will prevail?

The new STV was delayed "indefinitely" 2 days before it was set to launch. Also, no refunds for any applications or expenses paid.

I like to get out in TV and newspaper about thats it not medically reason for so long Quarantine and 3 Covid tests. 2 enough and 4 days enough.

And this over killing kills thai economy for the big group of Thai.

I find it fascinating that by logic those that have been here since pre-covid times have been exposed to exactly the same conditions as the locals, thus we cannot represent a higher risk factor. We are in fact the last safe source of foreign capital flowing to the brick and mortar businesses.

The amnesty/extension procedure far from reflects this in its lastminute intransparency however.

Why is that?