What is the history and significance of the 800,000 baht requirement for retirement visas in Thailand?

Jan 20, 2024
10 months ago
John **********
ORIGINAL POSTER
A history question if I may. How long has the 800,000 requirement for retirement visas been in effect. Has it always been that figure ? Or lower beforehand ?

What a substantial benefit for Thai banks to have that in their coffers and use in the international markets to shore up the Bhat. And how many retirees pass on, or leave LOS, and those funds are never withdrawn ?
14,407
views
22
likes
407
all likes
139
replies
1
images
30
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
The current 800,000 baht requirement for obtaining a retirement visa in Thailand has been in effect since 2008, increasing from a previous figure of 400,000 baht. This measure aims to ensure that retirees can support themselves financially and not become a burden on the Thai economy. Despite discussions about the financial implications for Thai banks, the requirement primarily serves to filter applicants based on their financial stability. Additionally, retirees have the option to demonstrate a sustainable income as an alternative to the deposit requirement.
NON-O RETIREMENT VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
  • Go to the Retirement Visa Section for information on requirements, including age restrictions, financial requirements, and necessary documentation.
  • For immediate assistance, contact Thai Visa Centre directly via LINE at @ThaiVisaCentre or Email them.
  • Explore recent discussions by using the Non-O Retirement Visa tag in the search box at the top of the page.
  • Join the Thai Visa Advice Facebook Group to ask your questions, and get advice from others.
Ken ******
as to mandatory retirement insurance:

thai govt should require every

tourists to buy health insurance

or contribute to a broad fund

set up by the govt for this

purpose. There are always

news that Thai public health

system spent too much on

foreigners or default withouT

settling the bill after treatment. which led to

immigration required OA retirees to buy

mandatory health insurance, however, the particular case in nov 2023

of a british man suffered from leukemia and unable to settle Thai hospital bill of about
*****
british pound sterling (reported in bangkokpost and thaiger)shows that mandatory

insurance for retirees simplily could not help

govt to reduce public health expense, but the

retirees suffer due to extremely high

insurance fee (comes with old age) and the

exclusion on pre conditions and all illness

that may arise from pre conditions, but are

retirees more susceptible to the latter illness

than other new medical problems, for

example, if common healtH priblems such as

diabetes, high blood pressure, and chlestrol

are all excluded from protection, maybe the

health insurance only useful for some cancers

such as lung cancer or PSA problem?
Ken ******
this case supports Thai govt intention to impose tourist tax to offset medical expense spent for foreigners

***************************************************************************************************************
*****
76-british-citizen-stranded-in-thai-hospital-with-a-
*****
0-baht-plea-to-escape/ (and required bank deposit or proof of monthly income)
Steve **********
@Ken *****
in 20+ years, never heard of a hospital, clinic, or Dr, having Thai Govt picking up farang med bill.

As with most countries. The parasitic insurance companies are selling the ' what if '

(one in million). But wants the millions to pay for the one.

They're simply predators instilling fear
Ken ******
maybe it means govt indirectly subsidize expats here (tourists and retirees) as govt hospitals and clinics are heavily funded by thai govt, i once visited a govt clinic (only once so far), the cost is unbelievably low 60baht compared to private hospital which often charged at least or about 1000baht, visit a specialist and it is 2000 in private hospital (tests and pills not included)
Ken ******
the required coverage increased from
*****
0 baht to three million (7 fold)
Steve **********
@Ken *****
for O-A visas
Ken ******
@Steve *********
up to now, there's been news or rumour other non O will require as well, i tend to think water being tested on the impact of imposing mandatory insurance, eg application no. before and after the policy enacted
Steve **********
@Ken *****
Once you take personal responsibility away from individuals ( has worked great to date ) , and bring in the parasitic systems of insur, health, social etc

You fail...they are corrupt.
Ken ******
and nothing could be done in regard to public policy, can only comply, same for 90days report or TM30 and so on
Ken ******
@Steve *********
personally i do not see how the mandatory insurance could help authority to recoup the alleged default by foreigners (as public hospitals simply charge very low fees even for foreigners), but the policy surely benefits the local insurers, maybe a lot
Steve **********
@Ken *****
know Dr's and Admins at 3 CM hospitals...there is not and surge or even a concern of farang not paying hosp bills, nor of hospitals complaining.

This is an Insur Co rumor again..and again. and ag...
Ken ******
@Steve *********
what i found , the alleged rationale for imposing mandatory health insurance for retirees in 2019

*************************************************************************************************************************
*****
33-details-of-mandatory-health-insurance-for-non-imm-o-a-visas-to-be-announced-next-week/
Alan ******
They doubled the amount for both marriage and Retirement. It was pretty sloppy with false claims of income and false bank accounts, so they tightened up the ship after a few had to plead to their embassies for money to go home.
Steve **********
As it was,. Is,.. and always will be.
Steve **********
@Alan *****
... Doubled what ? it's been same for 20 years
Alan ******
@Steve *********
200K Baht 1997 then to 500 K then 600k and in 2003 800 K baht information supplied by the late Ubonjoe.
Richard *********
@Alan *****
it was never 500,000< i started in 2002 it was 800,000

97 it was 200,000 and people were grandfathered in
Steve **********
@Alan *****
I said 20 years ! Its been 65.k or 800.k nested since then

When I arrived 21 odd years ago , baht was 45 /US1.$, saw it go as low as 28 /US 1.$
Alan ******
And I remember when the AUD was at 33 Thats when you went down the Oz went up. Oz now 22
Richard *********
OK:

lets say u use ur logic an the 800,000 is so ur not a burden on thailand in case shit goes bad

BUT u have 65,000 method< you could have zero savings

How does that stop u from being a burden, if things go sideways?
Steve **********
@Richard ********
even if things go sideways, every 30 days, your pensions are in your account.

Of they go ' real ' sideways, you're old and ready to move on anyway, Mai pen rai !
Steve **********
@Richard ********
Your income covers your monthly expenses. Most of us have savings for emergencies. But not nested without return.

Your monthly is more than enough to keep you from burdening Govt or others.

Unless.....
Oliver ********
There are around 100,000 people with retirement visas in Thailand. The total of their compulsory deposits is 100,000 * 800,000 = 80 billion baht. Thai banks' total desposits are around 17 trillion baht. Therefore, expat retirees' compulsory deposits make up only around 0.5% of total deposits. This doesn't have any meaningful impact on the value of the baht.
Ken ******
********************************************************
*****
558
Ken ******
******************************************************************************************************************
*******
/06/a-doctor-who-died-of-lung-cancer-awakens-people-to-fight-pm2-5/
Ken ******
personally i am more concerned with air quality now than financial or insurance requirement now in view of recent reports
Ken ******
************************************************
Ken ******
this youtuber, a lawyer, always keep track of local visa or immigration policy, integrity legal
Ken ******
there has been talk or rumour that the requirements will be raised, not only financial requurement, but so far seems only elite visa requirement has been drastically raised last year or so. Anyway the mandatory health insurance for retirement visa implementd in2019 was also said to be necessary due to foreigner causing great expense on thai public health service
Marty *********
@Ken *****
The requirements for a 1 year extension of the OA and O were identical. Apparently non-O visa holders were not a threat to the Thai health system 🙄 And I still had to deposit 800,000 baht.
Tulip ********
Good for the banks but nothing to do with propping up the baht.
Pete **********
I got my first retirement visa in 2003 it was 800 000 then
Steve **********
@Pete *********
got mine in 2002 with income from US, direct deposited monthly.
Chris ****
Most any country with the time will require proof of funds for residence. Tourists, not so much. Usually you hear this complaint from first time expats.
Todd *********
@Chris ***
proof of funds is very different than deposit of funds. Every country does this differently
Chris ****
@Todd ********
the money is refundable if you decide to leave.
Todd *********
@Chris ***
true, it is. You can take it out whenever. But leaving 800k baht at 0% or minimal interest for extended period of time is a dubious financial decision at best.
Chris ****
@Todd ********
cost of paradise
Todd *********
@Chris ***
Perhaps, but unecessary. An agent. 800k abroad making at least 5% pays 40k ++. More than covers 16k for renewals. And leaves 24k annually in your pocket. As opposed to paying 1900 baht for the right to stand in line at bank and immigration. Seems like a better cost analysis.
Dave **********
@Marty ********
as you know, as you have a LTR Visa, there are Visas where you need no funds in a Thai Bank just a good income. Also as pointed out by others on the Non O after the first year you can go to the monthly deposit. Living in Thailand is a privilege and I'm happy I qualify and they let me.
Marty *********
@Dave *********
The 800k deposit requirement is mostly a requirement for US, UK, and Australian citizens. After the first year you can switch to the income method. I think people from other countries can start right away with an income affidavit from their embassy.
Dave **********
@Marty ********
for those whose Embassy will not provide income affidavits!

I did the affidavit for more then a decade however many were stretching the truth and many Embassies do not have the manning to weed the truth stretchers out.
David **********
Raised it from 400,000 to 800,000 about a decade ago. Still have the 65,000 per month income option to savings.

Banks don’t give a shit. Think of the trillions held in Swiss accounts because of no one to claim the money.

Only an inconvenience for the depositors who cannot spend down past 400,000. Many make arrangements for the chick to clean out the account when dead. ☠️ Remember to give a good friend the PIN not the chick with instructions on what to do.

As an aside, the quickest way to killing yourself is to have life insurance with a Thai chick as the beneficiary. Her family will kill you.
Richard *********
Steve **********
@David *********
" never be worth more dead than alive "...........anywhere !
Todd *********
@David *********
i would have to think you would be very wrong about the banks 'not giving a shit' here. There are 3-4 million expats in the country. Maybe more. If even 1M of them holds 800k baht that 80B baht sitting on deposit for the bank to loan out. It's not chump change for the banking system here
David **********
@Todd ********
small money to them. The dipshits at immigration mandate the amount because the system was so abused and still is. The banks have to hold the what amounts to a somewhat insignificant amount of money for the guys that don’t use the income option.
Dirk **************
The 800,000 requirement for retirement visas in Thailand has been in effect since 2008. Before that, the figure was lower, at 400,000 baht. The increase was implemented to ensure that retirees have sufficient funds to support themselves during their stay in Thailand.

Regarding the benefit for Thai banks, it is true that having these funds in their coffers can provide stability and contribute to the overall strength of the Thai economy. However, it’s important to note that these funds are not directly used by Thai banks to shore up the baht or for international market activities. The funds are primarily meant to demonstrate financial stability and self-sufficiency for retirees seeking a retirement visa.

As for the number of retirees who pass away or leave Thailand without withdrawing their funds, specific data on this matter is not readily available. It would require a detailed analysis of individual cases and circumstances.
Richard *********
@Dirk *************
its been 800,000 since
*****
Marty *********
So there are 3 methods to meet the non-O financial requirements: the 800k deposit method, the 65k/mo monthly income method, and the combination method (only in some immigration offices). There are also different deposit requirements for single (800k) and married (400k) extensions.

All these allowed methods don't add up, to me, to be consistent with the simple explanation that the 800k is to bail you out in an emergency. There is no consistency. (not that there has to be)

Correct me if I am wrong but do they ask for the wife's financials when applying for a marriage extension? If not then that doesn't explain the lower 400k deposit for the marriage extension.

Also, my previous OA visa required health insurance AND I was required to deposit 800k. I actually kept a deposit of 1,200,000 in my bank to cover the immigration requirement and 400,000 to cover emergencies.

My 10 year pensioner LTR visa doesn't require a bank deposit but does require health insurance and a fairly high yearly income. That combination makes a little more sense.
Todd *********
@Marty ********
it doesn't even require health insurance. You just needed to show $100k deposit somewhere.
Marty *********
@Todd ********
Yes, it’s more liberal than the OA visa requirement but it specifically applies to the health insurance requirement. At least in their wording it is 100k or a health insurance policy. I just used the health insurance policy I was using for my previous OA visa.
Todd *********
@Marty ********
Understood. Either should be easy. i just showed the deposit amount and no questions asked at all.
Malcolm *************
At some point it was 500,000 baht but not sure when the figure was increased to the current 800k
Kevin *********
You get a Will in Thai Law with a good reputable professional firm.

Not a one man cheapskate.

You are required to supply medical proof you are of sound mind or the Will is invalid.

You set up your Beneficiaries as Executors.

While ensuring that the Law Firm will do the Probate if required.

A Will without Probate is useless.

And once the Will is done you check it with the Bank.

Any accounts based in another country require a separate Will.
Dave **********
@Kevin ********
how about a reference you must supply Medical Proof You Are Of Sound Mind? Had a couple wills drawn up here for myself, over the last couple decades, and my wife, who passed, used the same Law Firm and Probate of her will took 45 minutes in court and no such proof was ever requested or offered.
Nick **********
@Dave *********
You are absolutely correct of course : no medical proof you are sound of mind is required for a will to be valid.

Article 1704 in the civil and commercial code of Thailand (ป.พ.พ) states (my paraphrasing) that a will is void if the testator was deemed incapable by court. For all others, they are considered sound of mind unless it can be proven they weren't at the moment of making the will. Thus the burden of proof lies with those who may claim the testator wasn't sound of mind.

Source of the exact Thai law : มาตรา 1704
Dave **********
Nick MuayPlam been there done that when my Thai Wife of 31 years passed a couple decades ago so got a laugh out of the posters opinion. I sat in the Court with a professional wriiten Will and had zero problems. In and out 45 minutes and there was a couple land plots and a house everything put under my control as Executor/Beneficiary and when sold, one I held 15 years, the proceeds went to me.

Since I returned to Thailand, to live in 2001, I have always had my legal advice and legal work accomplished by real Lawyers who are allowed to represent me in court. So many use accountants a very possible big mistake in my opinion.
Damo ***********
@Kevin ********
holographic wills are accepted in Thai.. you dont even need to have it ‘witnessed’
Steve ********
You really believe the retirement 800k is "shoring up" the baht? Seriously? Geez, there's some deluded people around! 😂
Marty *********
I don’t think it is a conspiracy to support the banks but it is something many countries do. Maybe they are just copying each other.

It is a bit of a filter to discourage poor people from settling here. I’ve heard plenty of people comment that they have never had 800,000 ($22,555) in any bank in their life.
Andrew *******
@Steve *******
true ...but I know many who deliberately used up their super in order to claim a pension or part pension ....not everyone will end up with a million in super
Andrew *******
@Steve *******
depends who you know .....most I know have less than 200k not a great amount and it'll only last a few years ....even 400k will be gone in 10 years !!
Christopher ***********
@Marty ********
Absolutely believe that! My Visa Agent tells me that the majority of her customers are Brits receiving State Pension only.
Steve ********
@Christopher **********
Poor old Brits! Thank Christ for Australia!! Thank you Paul Keating for the mandatory superannuation laws all those years ago. We owe you a debt that can never be repaid!
Andrew *******
@Steve *******
the average super balance is only about $140 000.....most Aussie retires will end up on a pension after a few years once their super runs out . Infact most will get a part pension with their super ....the Brits have had a similar scheme in place for years but not refferred to as superannuation
Christopher ***********
@Steve *******
The irony is that people think because you live abroad you must be rich! In reality, we are unable to afford enormous gas central heating bills and pay our Council Tax (property tax to the local authority).
Steve ********
@Christopher **********
Exactly! So many Brits rely on the old age pension, which is not worth a fart. They failed to provide for their own retirement!
Braulio *********
@Marty ********
For a westerner, 800k Bt is not that much...
Steve **********
@Braulio ********
The 800k baht is an option.

The most prevalent means is to show proof of a monthly income of at least 65k baht from a foreign source.

Most have pension checks DD to a Thai bank, the funds are noted as DD from Foreign ( FTT ) transfer monthly.
Marty *********
@Steve *********
Expats from the US, UK, and Australia cannot get income affidavits from their embassies. They have to start with an 800,000 baht deposit and the build up a yearlong record of 65,000/month deposits to switch over to the monthly method. The other option is to use an agent that supplies the 800,000 baht for them. I don’t know the numbers and statistics but there are a lot of people using the 800,000 deposit method either directly or indirectly.
Steve **********
@Marty ********
they ( US Consul ) stopped income letters years ago.

I have been on a retirement visa 21 years based solely on income.

Never nested funds.

Things have changed, for others, not those that have been here a bit.
Marty *********
@Braulio ********
You would think so but it apparently is a lot for some. They either don't have it or they loathe keeping that money there accruing low interest.
Todd *********
@Marty ********
I think for any 'retiree' who does not have 800k, they are far from being retired. It's a small number. But your other point about not wanting to leave 800k as dead money is accurate. With an agent you do absolutely nothing, no banking, no immigration visits and the 800k abroad easily generates 40k annually to pay the 16k baht fee. So you put 24k in your pocket for doing absolutely nothing except keeping your 800k in a good interest or investment account. Given that choice, the agent is definitely the route i would take
Marty *********
@Todd ********
There is probably a slice of those retirees that can afford the yearly costs of an agent but don’t have the lump sum for a deposit. Basically, a cash flow problem. It does appear to me that some people are retiring here on very a marginal income and savings but they are getting a better life and are more secure than they would be at home.
Todd *********
@Marty ********
that would have to be an awfully small slice. Frankly the long perpetuated concept of anyone choosing an agent because they don't have 800k seems fairly ludicrous from a financial perspective. Someone who does not have 800k to their name but doesn't mind paying coming up with 35k initially and then 16k annually for a 1900 baht visa? Can't see that fitting many people. That does, however, fit the USA (or UK, canada, australia, german) social security refugee who has zero savings but collects a fairly robust social security check. They can be found dotted around rural communities or in Pattaya, CNX, maybe Hua Hin also.
Marty *********
@Todd ********
That’s who I was thinking of. Expats on Social Security.
Todd *********
@Marty ********
fair enough!! Christopher comment below supports that. I don't think i have encountered any like this, but maybe totally wrong perception.
Todd *********
Definitely a great deal for them. But I can’t really imagine why anyone would do this. Financial foolishness at best to leave 800k doing nothing
Todd *********
@Stephen *******
many ways. Agent, LTR, OX (depending on passport), Elite etc
Braulio *********
Richard *********
@Todd ********
agree, thats why agents are great

PLUS immigration gets a piece of the action
Todd *********
Julie ******
Just a question, do you have to leave that money there all the time? Or do you just have to make sure it’s there at visa renewal time? If you decide to leave can you take it with you? 😊
Marty *********
@Julie *****
Yes you can take it with you if you decide to leave Thailand
Brandon ************
@Julie *****
it needs to be there 2 months before you apply for extension and 3 months after. Then it can never drop below 400,000. So 5 months at the high amount and 7 months at the lower amount.
Richard *********
up until
*****
it was 200,000 0r 250,000

If you dont have a good solid will ( that thailand accepts) the thai bank gets ur cash

as one gets older an has no one to leave it to, a good reason to use an agent
Jeffrey **********
@Richard ********
correct it was about a 97 when the amount went up after the Thai banking crisis. It was also at that time where the dollar was 48 but to $1
David *********
@Richard ********
exactly right
Steve ********
@Richard ********
That could all change with the overhaul of the financial system in Thailand. Might be a lot of people getting "please explain" letters from the Tax Department, and having accounts frozen!
Marty *********
It seemed to have been 800,000 for quite a while when I deposited it 7 years ago.

Thailand is not alone to require bank deposits in order to get a retirement visa. The amounts vary from country to country.
Paul *******
My Australian friend died in Chiang Mai without having a valid will for Thailand. His Thai widow had to employ a lawyer to go to the Thai courts for release of his banked money (mainly his 800.000 thb for his retirement visa. It took a full 12 months to get access to his funds,
John *************
@Paul ******
yes? And whose fault was that?
Brandon ************
@Paul ******
not uncommon in many places without proper planning for such an occurrence
Brandon ************
It's not a conspiracy. They want to know you can take care of yourself in the event you have some type of medical emergency or other unforseen circumstance. They don't want you to become a burden to Thailand, so they make you prove you have enough money to support yourself each year.
เดวิด *******
@Brandon ***********
does this money have to be in a Thai bank?
Terry ********
@Brandon ***********
the problem with that logic is that if you use that money, you no longer qualify for the retirement extension and you have to leave. I don’t think it’s a conspiracy theory to say that it supports the banks. It certainly does since you have to keep it in there, unless you qualify with monthly deposits.
Damo ***********
@Terry *******
you do not ‘have’ to use that money on medical costs. Get health insurance or fund the mesical bills from some of your other assets. It is only 800k.. 🤦🏼‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
Terry ********
@Damo **********
true, but that’s what they want you to believe. That it’s there in case you have an emergency. If they said “you can use it if you need to but just make sure it’s there when you renew your extension”, then I would believe it. But requiring at least half to be there at all times and the full amount for 5 months of the year is disingenuous. It’s clearly to support the banks.
Brandon ************
@Terry *******
there's zero problem with the logic. Of course you no longer qualify, because now you're liable to become a burden to Thailand because you used the emergency money
Richard *********
@Brandon ***********
so

the 800,000 is to take care of urself if u have medical problems BUT

If you use it to take care of medical problems, u cant stay>

Yep

Thai logic
*****
5
Kevin **********
@Richard ********
Um, well yea because your probability of being a burden just skyrocketed. What's so hard to understand?
Brandon ************
@Richard ********
what about the next medical problem? That's Thailand's problem now?
Thomas *******
@Brandon ***********
right. Their country, their rules. What is so hard to understand that they want to make sure a person is financially solvent to live in their country? If you have a medical or financial problem that prevents you from meeting the requirements of your Visa, they should just acquiesce to you because you want to live there?
Terry ********
@Brandon ***********
up to you. But it’s a bit twisted in my mind. Many people have savings so their life isn’t totally upended in the event of an emergency. But you’re saying it’s totally ok for their life to be upended even if they do have savings, as long as the Thai government doesn’t get upset.
Richard *********
ok; than why is it only 400,000 if u have a thai wife?

hospital bills are hospital bills 🙂
Brandon ************
@Richard ********
because you have a spouse who is also expected to be contributing financially.
Jack ****************
@Brandon ***********
and are not old by definition
Richard *********
@Brandon ***********
just curious: How many thai wife's married to expats have 400,000 in the bank that you know of?
Kevin **********
@Richard ********
I know one for sure
Becky **********
@Richard ********
lots of them these Thai woman aren’t all bar girls like many might think. Many of these Thai wives were international students that had enough money to go to school abroad and met their husbands.
StĂŠfan ********
@Brandon ***********
makes no sense. In the real world, the married foreigner takes care of 2 people.
Jeffrey **********
@StĂŠfan *******
or more than two people if you have children or she does
Tangerine *********
StĂŠfan ********
@Tangerine ********
I know... It's usually an entire family, including cousins and cattle 😂
Tangerine *********
Kim *********
@StĂŠfan *******
many foreigners are married to a Thai woman who has a good income
StĂŠfan ********
@Kim ********
That's certainly not the norm. Of course, there are exceptions, and I was in that category, as my now ex-wife was wealthy (through inheritance), but she definitively stuck out in the community as the "richer than her husband" woman. In the VAST majority of cases, Thai wives come from poor backgrounds and seldomly work at all. That said, a "good income" in Thailand is a pittance of maybe 15 or 20K. In fact, marrying a foreigner is akin to escaping poverty.
Daniel **********
@StĂŠfan *******
that may be your experience, but not mine.
Kim *********
@StĂŠfan *******
yes Stefan I know that - just thought I would mention that there are exceptions of which I know a few
Brandon ************
@StĂŠfan *******
what makes no sense is why a female married to a Thai male has no monetary requirements at all
StĂŠfan ********
Marty *********
@Brandon ***********
The problem is that if you actually use the money for that purpose then you mess up your ability to extend the next time. At some level that story doesn’t make sense. I’ve never heard an explanation of the 800,000 from Immigration
Doug *********
@Marty ********
Preventing foreigners from becoming a burden on the Thai state because of health problems makes sense, but if that is really the rationale isn’t proof of insurance a better way to address that risk?
Brandon ************
@Doug ********
insurance is no guarantee of payment. Thai insurance excludes pre-existing conditions. Also there are other emergencies that could arise unrelated to health.
Doug *********
@Brandon ***********
Insurance substantially reduces the risks.
Rok ********
@Marty ********
just use the 65,000 baht transfer per month and you will be also Ok
Tullio *******
@Marty ********
it’s a seasoning period before and after renewal, the rest of the period you can actually use the money as long you maintain a minimum balance, moreover you can have a monthly income of 65k instead of the lump sum.
Marty *********
@Tullio ******
You can use 400,00 for a period of 7 months. The monthly income method (65,000/months) is an example of why the 800,000 story doesn’t make sense. They don’t require you to have emergency funds if you use the 65k/mo method.
Tullio *******
@Marty ********
exactly, and you can also use a combination of the two, minimum balance and monthly income.
Brandon ************
@Marty ********
of course you lose the ability to stay. You used the money that proved you won't become a burden to Thailand. Now leave because it's liable to happen.
Mark *********
@Brandon ***********
Exactly. Just like any country. You must pay your way. Many stay here and lose their home country benefits too. No money, no benefits, no financial cushion. Of course countries must protect themselves from these that drain the system.
Julie ******
@Brandon ***********
don’t you have to have health insurance?
Ken ******
@Julie *****
health insurance excludes all pre existing conditions and any illness arising out subsquently, also some have protection ceiling.
Darlene *********
@Julie *****
not everyone has/can afford a fully comprehensive health insurance. Even with our more than ample health insurance, we( OA visa) are still obliged to have 800k in the bank as surety.
Tullio *******
@Julie *****
no you don’t
Brandon ************
@Julie *****
no, there is no health insurance requirement for a standard non-O and yearly extension based on it
Mark *********
@Brandon ***********
I totally agree.
Thai Visa Advice and Everything Else
... members ¡ 60% approval rate
The Thai Visa Advice And Everything Else group allows for a broad range of discussions on life in Thailand, beyond just visa inquiries.
Join the Group
Thai Visa Advice and Everything Else
View the Conversation
Thai Visa Advice and Everything Else