@Jer***
honestly I give up. It's a relatively simple concept you seem to be intentionally obtuse about it.
The key concept here is very simple, that $32k up front today is worth more money than spread over 20 years.
There is also a difference between money you pay AS A VISA FEE and never see again and money that you merely need to DEPOSIT but that stays yours.
You also don't seem to understand the idea that the annual deposit for the retirement visa can be _the same_ money from one year to the next, with your comparing the visa deposit to a supposed Elite annual fee. This makes no sense as you KEEP the deposited money.
I don't know if you honestly can't see the difference between these concepts or if you are just deliberately obtuse or trying to fool yourself to make yourself feel better about your purchase. Or maybe you're just playing a game, that you like to argue on the internet.
The concept of your expiration date is a separate issue. But yes it does actually factor in to financial planning in retirement. If you buy an annuity, for example, for a given fixed price you will get a higher monthly payout the older you are because the annuity company expects you to die sooner.
So in this sense, yes, it is relevant. If your life expectancy is only 5 years a 20 year visa is even less worth it.
What happens to your Elite visa if you die? It's gone. At least any money you have invested you CAN leave to someone.
I'm not against Elite. Not at all. I just think people need to look at it and the true costs and the other options realistically, and you do not help with this, you continually try to obfuscate the true cost of it vs the other viable options.
There are valid scenarios to buying Elite- if you don't qualify for a long-term visa otherwise, that's a good one. So, under-50s, absolutely.
The other one would be that if you have SO much money that the $32,000 simply doesn't matter to you at all and it's worth it to you to spend $32k to avoid the small annual bureaucracy you would otherwise need to go through with a non-immigrant visa. I get that, if you are so rich it doesn't matter, why not, it's very marginally easier.
But if we are trying to have a discussion purely on the financial cost of it, where we are presuming that the $32k does matter to the person, I think we need to be realistic on what it actually costs, vs 1,900B every year for a regular non-immigrant visa. You can certainly factor in an opportunity cost of the deposit, for the period it needs to be maintained, that you can't have it in a more lucrative investment vehicle, but it is impossible for that to be higher than a fee that you pay and never see again. That's a 100% loss.
It's difficult to discuss this with you because honestly you seem to either be trolling or if not just really unable to wrap your head around or engage with any of these concepts, you just talk past them.