This is NOT an official government website. We are an independent resource providing information and assistance to travelers.

What should DTV visa holders expect when arriving at Chiang Mai airport?

Mar 15, 2025
13 days ago
Has anyone here landed in Chiang Mai airport today with a DTV visa. I saw a fellow's post saying that today at th CNX airport, all the DTV holders were brought to a side table and checked the followings:

- show money 20K baht

- return ticket

- hotel booking

- reason of their visit

It was also mentioned that they were also required to fill out a new arrival card.

It sounds quite odd and those questions were usually asked for visa exempt or TR visa.

Please confirm if you went through CNX immigration today.
9,508
views
22
likes
281
all likes
106
replies
0
images
32
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
There have been recent reports from DTV (Digital Nomad Visa) holders arriving at Chiang Mai airport who faced additional scrutiny during immigration checks. Passengers reported being asked to show proof of 20,000 baht, return tickets, hotel bookings, and the reason for their visit, along with filling out a new arrival card. This level of questioning is typically more common for visa-exempt travelers and Tourist (TR) visa holders. Some users expressed skepticism about these requirements, citing their own experiences of having fewer questions during entry. It appears there might be inconsistency in the immigration process based on nationality or previous immigration history, with suggestions that certain groups may face more scrutiny than others. Overall, this has raised concerns among expats about potential changes or enforcement of immigration rules in Thailand.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
Ke *****
I'm so glad I did not do the DTV visa lol. You guys are treated like low class villains or something hahahahaa
Felipe *********
@Ke ****
so you prefer to pay 600k for the Elite?
Jason **********
I flew back in on February 18th to chiang mai had zero questions just stamped for 180 days and on my way.
Elías ****************
This has nothing to do with the type of visa you've got, but whether you have a past "obscure" history with Immigration (like living for years on TR visas or border bounces) or if they suspect you'll be working here instead of being a digital nomad/attending soft power courses.
Zachari *********
I just came back last week after 2 days in Hong Kong and they didn’t ask me a thing I just showed the DTV and they stamped me and my wife and she didn’t even show anything. We also have a toddler, which seems to help with getting through immigration fast
Dylan *****
I flew back through cnx on Tuesday on dtv, was no problem
Anonymous ******************
Two weeks ago, when I came back from Hanoi to Chiang Mai with a fresh DTV (remote worker), I was questioned by the immigration officer:

- What do you do? Who do you work for?

- Show me hotel stay

I tried opening my initial application documents on my phone to show to her, but cloud didn’t connect properly. So told her I stay at a house I rent and after some awkward waiting she was only like ‘show me address’, which I had ready in my notes app. She was ok with that and stamped me in.

Lesson learnt for me was to have all my initial application documents saved offline on my phone in case I get asked again.

So what’s reported here sounds like it could be legit, I was very surprised about the officer’s questions at the time.
Jack *******
Anonymous participant 996 do this for every thing in life, passport , driver L, etc. can be very handy, and always in a place with no connection!
Paul *******
Nothing wrong with being questioned. Most immigration officers worldwide do that.
Deniz *********
Can you show us your "fellow's Post" please?

If not then please be careful not to spreading rumors or misinformation, knowingly or unknowingly.

What your fellow say is insane and unbelievable.
Kenny *****
My guess ... the immigration is targetting certain nationalites as these group of dtv holders are doing illegal stuffs in Thailand.
Incognia **********
@Kenny ****
Why they make DTV then?
Sean *******
They should have flew into BKK. I re entered there after staying for 6 months three days ago. No questions asked.
Nicola ***********
@Sean ******
you stayed 3 days out of Thailand before you came back ?
Sean *******
@Nicola **********
Yes I stayed 3 nights in Da Nang and re entered on Wednesday.
Simon ************
@Sean ******
they didnt ask for anything? Just show your passport/dtv and then enter with new 180 days? 🙂 i ask because in april my 180 days will finish so I will go vietnam 5 days to get new 180 days when I come back
Sean *******
Christopher ******
Used mine roday.. go to a woman.. men seem to hate you
Incognia **********
@Christopher *****
no go to a man.Some woman immigration officers dont like foreigner men
Paul *******
@Christopher *****
Actually, the opposite tends to be more true.
Paul *******
At the Saphan Pla land (sea) border in Ranong, Thai officials may also ask for evidence of
*****
Baht and to a lesser extent, other documents such as accommodation bookings and a plane ticket before letting you stamp out. These documents won't be re-examined upon re-entry because they know you're most likely to return the same way, thus the exit check is the one you need to be concerned about.

In practice they probably won't push for anything but the
*****
Baht and even that you may be able to talk your way out of.

For me, having been there last year, heading in the direction of Myanmar its not difficult to have
*****
Baht on you because credit cards are not accepted anywhere in southern Myanmar anymore due to the coup and related sanctions / internet issues and so forth.

ATMs are unreliable, may not work and use an exchange rate 50% of the actual one, so you need to bring plenty of cash.
John *******
I looked at the link. The guy posting does seem to have a DTV for him and his wife. He has been posting about the process since December and shows semi-blacked out copies of the visa, his wife’s visa, etc. he is also not anonymous in his post. He is Burmese and wonder if that is part of thr issue and immigration was specifically targeting that nationality.
Paul ********
@John ******
The link mentions all foreigners with DTVs being pulled aside.
Paul *******
@Paul *******
He came off a flight from Myanmar so probably all the DTV holders were Burmese.
Reece ********
I am flying back into Don Muang and then to CM I guess Im already stamped up at bkk and any shenanigans will happen then?
Paul *******
@Reece *******
Correct. The CNx sector will be domestic so you deal with immigration in Bangkok.
Felipe *********
Yet another reason to not go to CM
Paul *******
@Felipe ********
Not many flights landing there unless you're coming in from Kunming (hardly any westerners do), Taipei, Yangon or maybe Hanoi. Everyone else enters through Bangkok, clears immigration there then takes a domestic flight up to CNX.
Ja***
@Paul ******
Taipei, Seoul, Singapore
Paul *******
@Ja***
Not many flights buddy. I'm not going to list all international flights landing in Chiang Mai. Suffice to say it's a tiny number compared to even Don Muang Airport let alone Suvarnabhumi.
Eva *********
@Paul ******
I am flying in from KUL.
Paul *******
@Eva ********
Yes there are flights from there too. You should be OK and in your case makes more sense to fly direct than transit in BKK though you do have far more flight options to Bangkok than CnX
Elizabeth ****************
CNX Immigration has been more tricky lately overall - based on personal experiences that I won’t recount here. But this seems like it’s not accurate.
Toni *******
My first question would be, how could someone know the visa type of the people pulled aside? There was one troll in the group claiming almost the same thing, but deleted post shortly after... or blocked me, i dont know
Paul *******
@Toni ******
Yeah good point. I firmly believe they're pulling over Burmese citizens and anyone on a visa exemption but I don't think they're targeting DTV holders in general...not until we have more proof anyway.
Wannikea *********
I have a bit of a hard time believing this especially on 180 day stay that you have to book a ticket out, the 20,000 baht I can almost understand, these are things the officers do to deny people.
Luit *****************
@Wannikea ********
I thought the
*****
baht rule only applies for visa exempt.
Wannikea *********
@Luit ****************
any tourist class entrant
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
Hey, I posted it cuz I want to confirm it. I don't even believe it. So let's wait for people who actually landed CNX today.

Original post I'm referring (use translate)

********************************************
Paul *******
Another possibility is all these people have a prior history in Thailand under other visas, which were abused or something.
Paul *******
Ok anonymous participant but I didn't see that. Maybe the OP means other Burmese because presumably, landing at Chiang Mai, which has very few international flights and him having stepped off a flight from Yangon, it was likely full of other Burmese citizens. Not many westerners are going to Myanmar these days. You would be lucky to have one or two westerners on board any in or outbound flight to Myanmar these days.
Greg ********
Anonymous participant Thanks for posting the link. Will be interesting to hear more experiences.
Paul *******
Could be because the DTV holders are Burmese, although even so, they shouldn't be denied. Still, I can see why they were targeted based on their nationality.
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Paul ******
But in the post, he mentioned that it's not only towards Burmese, all nationalities with dtv were pull aside.

That's why I posted here.
Michael ********
Anonymous participant I haven't entered recently (last entry November 2024, no issues, directly to CNX from Taipei), but I can't help but wonder if being Burmese has something to do with this, as you're referencing a Burmese group. They may be concerned about illegal working, etc. hence more likely to investigate a Burmese citizen than many of the Western countries.
Greg ********
@Michael *******
I was just chatting online to someone else. Same question you raised. Is it to do with a certain country/passport?
Michael ********
@Greg *******
Could be. OP I think is Burmese and it seems like in the Burmese visa group there are problems. But that’s to be expected that the Burmese are scrutinized a bit more. It’s unfortunate but it’s how it is.
Greg ********
@Michael *******
A very good friend of mine who I worked with is Burmese. He is an acclaimed Oncologist specialising in Immunotherapy. Invited to speak all over the world. He had a nightmare travelling until he became a Singapore citizen. I forgot which country it was but he had to fly to Bangkok from Singapore to apply for a visa at an embassy. They had none in Singaporexand only accepted in person applications and not through agents
Paul *******
@Michael *******
Exactly my thoughts. Translating the messages in the group, it seems there's some confusion even among fellow members. Thus, I don't think this is really a thing but it could be that Burmese are being targeted.
James ********
@Paul ******
agreed 👍
Peter ******
Who carries big money around these days ?
Alex *******
@Pe***
20,000 is only about $500 ✅

I always take a fair bit of cash anytime I cross a border just in case I don't get back in. Cash is the best, no digital trail left, no bank fees for me or businesses I buy from. I never pay with cards or do bank transactions cause the business we are buying from will usually have to pay tax on that money, but when you pay cash they can put it in their pocket and no taxes or transaction fees
Paul *******
@Alex ******
I try to pay with cash as much as possible but you can't completely avoid using debit and credit cards. Eventually, you'll run out of cash. Car rental agencies don't accept cash. Flights need to be booked and paid for using a credit card (unless you happen to go to one of the very few remaining old school travel agencies) and so forth. I personally prefer it if there's an option given. For car rentals, I know that cash can't be accepted but if it's a restaurant, I won't go if cash isn't accepted. On the other hand, sometimes I need to use a card and would thus appreciate it if the business accepts cards in addition to cash.
Peter ******
@Alex ******
I am completely legal and I don't try to avoid paying any tax and I have no qualms about leaving any digital trail , I am not a cash in hander, under the table payments king of guy
Alexander *************
@Peter *****
I do. Because I know the rules ever since.
Bobby *******
@Peter *****
that’s not big money
Peter ******
@Bobby ******
It is when its cash and you mostly deal with online banking , paper money is a thing of the past
Bobby *******
@Peter *****
it’s peanuts boy.
Peter ******
@Bobby ******
I didn't mean its big money itself Dad , I did mean that in this day of cashless society's, its a rather rather large amount to be carrying around . Paper money is for old people
Bobby *******
@Peter *****
it’s one €500 note.
Peter ******
@Bobby ******
Point being that many people these days do not carry cash around , all transactions are done electronically . I often fly door to door without using paper money at all
Paul *******
@Peter *****
Correct. I usually carry some cash, but not a huge amount. I tend to carry a fair amount of cash when departing Thailand for countries like Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, which are more cash based than Thailand. I usually return with minimal cash because I consider myself a resident here returning home. I don't see the need for arriving with tons of cash; in fact, I'd struggle to do so, considering I've just come back from a country where I spent all my cash. When I return to Thailand, I might have 1000 or 2000 Baht left in my wallet and maybe a smattering of foreign currency I'll keep for my next trip to whatever county I just came from.
Toni *******
@Peter *****
i did before i had a bank account here, i usually stayed about 8 months
Paul *******
@Toni ******
There were times I did that when I came in from my country but not on re-entry to Thailand from Cambodia, Malaysia or Laos. By the time I come back from those countries, I won't have much cash left. I will always have enough to pay for my expenses to get myself to my house of course, which may mean one night at an intermediate hotel (especially if coming back from Malaysia, which is far). Returning from Vientiane, Phnom Penh etc that can easily be done in a day.
Toni *******
@Paul ******
i did my 180day border run to cambodia by car, parked, walked 2minutes to border and <10min later i was back in the car no questions asked
Toni *******
@Paul ******
ah yes, I only did that when coming from home country, not border runs... but anyway i think they accept showing balance on bank app or atm, no need to be cash? I have never been asked, have come here 20+ times in the last 4years
Paul *******
@Toni ******
No, cash would be asked for if they request it but except for Ranong, it's not normally asked for at the border.
Paul *******
@Peter *****
Good point, I don't. Actually, I sometimes carry lots of money when I leave Thailand but when I return, I have little left. That's because I spend all my money in the country I go to. I make sure I have enough left to get home. By the next day or the day after, I'll have more money again but I don't need
*****
Baht to drive myself home from Cambodia for example. I need just enough to pay for fuel, a meal and so forth and once I'm at home I can sort out the rest.
Greg ********
@Peter *****
I think it is cash or show immediate access to it. Only ever seen someone asked once for it many entries. They were going through everything with him though. Accom, return ticket etc.
Nathan ****
500k requirement in the bank but pulled aside to make sure we can return home and survive here? :D
Anonymous ******************
@Nathan ***
in fairness, that 500k requirement when applying technically does not need to be yours. Some countries when applying just require an end balance statement showing 500k, which could be borrowed from a friend or family member. Download the statement for the application and then return the money. I was about 20k short when I applied, borrowed the difference and downloaded the statement when it was in my account and applied/gotten approved. Just saying, the two (dtv requirement and entry requirement) are not mutually exclusive.
Paul *******
If true and this nonsense continues, I think I'll go back to my marriage visa. So far, I haven't had an issue with the DTV but just saying...
John **********
The DTV is basically a tourist visa
Helen ********
@John *********
true, but they don't normally ask for those items with a tourist visa. I can't read Thai but was under the impression that the entry laws, thinking Royal Gazette, only mentions those requirements for visa exempt.
John **********
@Helen *******
pretty sure they can also ask for the same things on a tourist visa
Paul *******
@John *********
Each entry is for 180 days. It may be kinda like a tourist visa but entry should be allowed without hindrance for anyone holding this visa otherwise its a farce. Why promote a 5 year visa if you're going to treat people like they were short term visitors.
John **********
@Paul ******
that's a bit like saying the METV is a 6 month visa. While the visa is valid for 5 years it's not a 5 year visa, it's a visa that gets you 180 days each entry, just like the METV gets you 60 days each entry.
Paul *******
@John *********
That's not the proper analogy. Yes, each entry is 180 days but you can come and go over 5 years. You don't need to spend 3-6 months outside the country between longer stays as you do if you're on a 10 year tourist/business visa for the USA. With one of those, you can stay 180 days per entry but assuming you've spent 180 days, you better leave for a bare minimum of 180 days before returning and preferably at least 1 year or you could be denied re-entry.

Thailand allows you to come back the same day or certainly within a couple of days of exiting and do this across 5 years.
John **********
@Paul ******
they do that for the METV as well but nobody refers to it as a 6 month visa despite the fact you can come and go for 6 months
Paul *******
@John *********
You can get up to 9 months out of an METV.
John **********
@Paul ******
it's valid for 6 months from the date of issue
Paul *******
@John *********
You can re-enter just before it expires for another 60 days then extend that for a further 30 days.
John **********
@Paul ******
I understand that but your just trying to deflect. You know very well it is valid for 6 months
Paul *******
@John *********
No, it's you trying to deflect actually. You're trying to tell me that a DTV is the same as a tourist visa despite the fact one has to go through a vigorous process to obtain one and the visa is valid for unlimited entries over 5 years, which is far more generous than any other visa Thailand offers with the exception of the LTR and the OX retirement categories, neither of which are very popular due to their stringent application criteria and/or in the case of the OX, the fact very few consulates issue one.
John **********
@Paul ******
I am telling you that the DTV IS classed as a tourist visa, that's just a fact. And you can't compare a DTV to long term visas which allow you to stay inside Thailand indefinitely without ever leaving. The DTV does not allow that, it allows you to stay 180 days and you can get ONE extension of 180 days. The only distinction between the DTV and other tourist visas is the number of days you get stamped in for and the reason for it being issued
Paul *******
@John *********
Unless you have a permanent residency visa then you have to renew your permission to stay every year. Exceptions are for OX visa, elite and LTR visa holders who can stay multiple years before needing to do anything.
John **********
@Paul ******
still deflecting I see
Paul *******
John Stanners No, you are as you fail to understand how the visa you're on worms. An extension of stay doesn't allow permanent residency. You can only spend one year in Thailand at a time before needing to renew your extension. If you aren't approved, you have to leave. Your retirement visa is in a sense also a tourist visa, even if classified as non-immigrant, you can't work on it and you have NO possibility of being allowed to convert to permanent residency.

At public hospitals, you pay the same rate as tourists do, whereas work permit holders pay less than you do.
Tim *****************
@Paul ******
@John *********
the METV is exactly the analogy, they have based it on that, and I’ve had it in the same past. The issue a lot of people trying to stay long term on it is that it’s not a guarantee to get back in just because you have the visa. Imm can still deny entry, which they already are it seems - though there is nuance in every case.

The reps on Friday were surprised but also not surprised to hear of so many extensions and re entries being problematic so early, but expect it to be for many trying to stay long term on it going forward.

I offered the example of someone leaving CM for smoky season and going abroad for 3 months to avoid it as one that would probably be ok, and that seemed to be a situation that would fit the intention of the visa. That said, he wasn’t immigration and this is Thailand which has a rep for being a tad inconsistent at the pointy end.
Paul *******
@Tim ****************
I suspect it's the previous immigration history / nationality causing the issues and maybe...those who spend the entire 180 days and return same day.

Those like me who usually spend under 90 days per entry and then travel abroad for days to weeks on business and for other reasons shouldn't have an issue.

If, it proves that even people like me start facing issues I'll immediately switch to another visa type and tell everyone not to apply for the DTV.

That hasn't happened so far.
Tim *****************
@Paul ******
yep, you’ve nailed it there. If you look like you’re a digital nomad and spending a few weeks here and there out of the country you’re likely to have little issue. Almost word for word what they were telling me.
Tim *****************
@Paul ******
he’s right. I’ve been to 4 DTV events - including one yesterday where I’ve chatted to the same people who came up with the visa twice now - and they confirm it is effectively tourist rights but you can work remotely on. It is not a visa to stay here for 5 years, or any extended period, it is just usable over a five year period. A couple of people who were there are now very concerned as they decided to interpret it that they can stay for 5 years.
John **********
@Paul ******
it's not kinda like. It's officially termed a special tourist visa. I guess that makes it a tourist visa on steroids but a tourist visa nonetheless
Michael ********
@Paul ******
Yes this. The constant virtue-signalling "this is just a tourist visa" nonsense is ridiculous. MFA themselves went on a YouTube interview and explicitly stated this is to allow remote workers to basically live in Thailand. The reason it's probably a tourist visa is because it's easier, and also so they don't have to give out other benefits unless you integrate more locally. In this way, it makes sense. The government themselves said you can do 180+180 and then border run to repeat. Yet everyone is freaking out every other post acting like you "need" to be gone for 2-3 months out of the year minimum.
Incognia **********
@Michael *******
it must be DESTINATION STAYING VISA not tourist visa.Tourist in a country 5 Years?
Tim *****************
@Michael *******
I suggest anyone wanting to find out if how they want to use it will fly goes to a DTV event and speaks to them. I’ve been to 4 (not that I plan on getting one) and spoken to the reps twice afterwards and they will tell you it is based on tourist visas and that it isn’t designed for long term stay. It’s not for remote workers to live here, it’s for digital nomads who will spend time in other places too, even if Thailand is their base. They have the power to manage it how they please because the way they’ve worded it, which they seem quite pleased about.

Anyway, my point being people interested in one should go to an event and speak directly to them about the questions they want answers to as they are not written in the documentation, basically purposely. Most people are choosing to interpret the wording how they want to, rather than consider how immigration will choose to enforce it.

Well worth going along is all I’d say as it would clear up a lot of the different assumptions people are making.
Michael ********
@Tim ****************
and what are these “DTV events” and who are these “reps?”

Here’s my evidence from my last post. An interview with a government official:

************************************************


If you have an interview with a qualified government official against this, do share please.

But at present this is the best info. You CAN stay long term no problem… According to a government official.
Michael ********
@Tim ****************
MFA said you can do 180+180 then border run to 180+180 no problem. It’s likely a tourist visa so they don’t have to give out permanent residence after 5 years. Instead you must get even more integrated locally (ie start a local business) and switch your visa.

Until I see concrete proof of this like an interview with an immigration officer, this is how it is. The government themselves said it.

Everything that’s happening reads more like immigration is a bit overwhelmed with more work and there weren’t clear guidelines on how to manage extensions, so it’s basically turned into a re-application because immigration doesn’t want to green light a 180 day extension then the person runs out of money… Hence the recheck of 500k baht…

Need to wait for more clear evidence because interpreting it as “you’re supposed to spend several months out of the year away” also isn’t right and it isn’t explicitly stated.

What we KNOW is that MFA said you CAN do 180+180 border bounce again through 5 years. And that’s it.

If there’s an interview of a higher ranking government official saying otherwise do feel free to share.
Tim *****************
@Michael *******
as I say, go to a DTV event and have a conversation with them. Watching an interview with generic questions isn’t the same as the answers are being interpreted through an applicants lens, not through how it will be enforced. Just because something isn’t explicitly stated doesn’t mean it’s not how it’s going to be enforced - exactly how it was explained to me on Friday. They - or any country’s visa stipulations really - can’t and won’t cover every eventuality or situation, which I guess is why there are agents.

TAT are running events for people to attend, which most countries wouldn’t, so people can ask the questions they want answered so I would take advantage of it. I report on digital nomad visas, so go to keep up and hear directly from them, not because I plan to get one.

You are correct that it is new for Thailand too - that much they volunteered themselves - so there will be a learning curve for them, but that’s what makes being patient a sensible decision atm.

Anyway, just passing on what answers to my questions were. Honestly, go along to one as the 2 or 3 who were with me that have the DTV were surprised about quite a few answers because they’ve misinterpreted the information - and missing information - that is out there. Plus they put on free food and drink!
Michael ********
@Tim ****************
where does one find these DTV events? I’ve not heard of them. I’m in chiang mai currently I’ve already got the DTV. And who is running it? Actual immigration or random people? Can you send me the link to a “DTV event?”
Tim *****************
@Michael *******
there was one in Chiang Mai on Friday at Yellow, and another in January at Alt. They ran several at launch at OneNimman and other venues. TAT run them - they were the authority who developed the visa, which I guess is telling that the tourism authority are the lead.

Just because you haven’t heard of something doesn’t make them a myth, as you seem to be inferring.

I don’t know when the next one will be, maybe contact them or do a Google search.
Michael ********
@Tim ****************
First of all, I did not infer ANYTHING. I asked you directly about these events.

At present the government has said you can do 180 + 180 and border run to stay the duration of the 5 years.

There has been no explicit outward statement that you “must” spend 2-3 months out of Thailand per year.

*******************************************************************************************************************************


You mean this? This is NOT high level immigration officers like the YouTube video I shared with you. TAT is here to promote tourism and visas, MFA created the visa. There is a YouTube video where MFA goes on camera to confirm that you can stay 180 days, extend for 180, then border run, and repeat this for 5 years.

There is no official statement otherwise, and these “events” at yellow coworking are not coming from MFA/immigration- if it’s official that we “must spend 2-3 months per year out of Thailand,” it will be made known outwardly, not at small events promoted by TAT.

There are already people that have stayed for around 180 days and extended or border ran with 0 issues.

Until there is a concrete, definitive message that you must spend 2-3 months out of the year, then it’s not the case.
Tim *****************
@Michael *******
well it defo read as inference. But anyway I’m not arguing with opinion here, just thought it might be helpful sharing what is currently being said by the authorities in direct response to some of the questions being asked. The response to your 180+180 was that you can apply, but there is no guarantee you will get it. Can is the key word - they don’t say will get.

And yep, this was the one on Friday. Took the opportunity to ask Shiv some questions as it’s the second time I’d met him at one of these.

Again, I’d recommend speaking to them directly at these events as some of the assumptions and interpretations being held by a lot of people on the DTV or hoping to be are misleading and in some cases incorrect.

Anyway, I’m out on this thread. People are welcome to accept or not accept what I’m sharing, it’s social media after all. Some might find it useful as not many will make the effort or be able to go.
Michael ********
@Tim ****************
So far there is no evidence that you can’t stay 180+180 even just doing border runs indefinitely. TAT is a lesser authority than MFA, like I said earlier, so until there is an OFFICIAL announcement I don’t think there’s much point going to some meant to promote the visa. If it’s not allowed to do 180 days + border run + 180 for the period of 5 years then MFA will make it known instead of having it whispered at tiny events.

I recommend watching this video as this is the only video I know of a ranking government official from MFA that talks about this visa in English:
************************************************


Keep in mind that despite this video there was still blatant wrong information being talked want for MONTHS, such as that the extension will be 10k baht instead of the usual extension amount.

I appreciate you sharing with me what you heard, I just want to recommend that video because whoever is saying that you “can’t” do 180 + 180 for the duration of 5 years is misled.

Again, MFA or immigration (TAT is NOT immigration) themselves will tell us if we can’t.

And yes, individual circumstances do matter (ie in the case of extensions, you must prove 500k baht balance for 30 days prior, etc.).

But I rest my point that there is not one single official indication that we aren’t allowed to be here almost continuously for 5 years besides extensions and border runs as long as we follow the correct procedures.
Paul *******
@Michael *******
Correct. It's similar to a tourist visa but still a separate category. It does not grant you any more rights than a tourist visa does except for a longer stay.
Shay ******
@Paul ******
for years i struggled to understand Thai logic so i stop trying