The conversation primarily revolves around the AstraZeneca vaccine and its associated risks, particularly in light of reports of adverse reactions, including blood clots and deaths following vaccination. Participants discuss various cases of individuals who have died post-vaccination, questioning whether those deaths were directly caused by the vaccine or if underlying health issues played a role. The perspectives shared highlight concerns over vaccine safety, the need for more thorough investigations into adverse effects, and differing opinions on the necessity of vaccination, including debates over the efficacy and risks involved with COVID-19 vaccines. There is a significant exchange regarding misinformation and the impact of public perception on vaccine acceptance.
Monk didn’t died from vaccine he died from health problem !!!
Tom *******
I wouldn’t be surprised anymore than I wouldn’t be surprised that tens or even hundreds of thousands of people died not from Covid but from any number of issues, some health related, some not. Ive heard of people who got a positive PCR test and then two weeks later died in a car crash, but COVID was put on the death certificate. There’s lots of tomfuckery going on with this plandemic.
Reply to
Tom *******
Reply
Cliff *********
Of all the posts I like “ don’t barrette people” ...yep, don’t do that, 555
you are wasting your time telling them. They will gladly risk their health for a cocktail of DNA altering garbage. Then brag about it in Fakebookon Fakebook. Ones the vax companies refuse to take legal responsibility for? That should tell you everything. Clearly not. Trading a 99.8% chance of survival for...drumroll please...a 99.9%? Idiots are born every day and Darwinism will take care of them. Don't sweat it. They were warned. It’s their bodies. Let them do with them what they want so they can attend live sports and music events. Stupid just doesn’t begin to cover it.
Got news for you. Might be contaminated with the AZ vac, if it was made at the Emergent plant in Baltimore.
Paul *********
For now ;)
Reply to
Paul *********
Reply
ลีน่าทอง ***********
Ohh dear dear me.. May he rest in peace..was it the Sinovac Vaccine?..
Gene **********
If this person was an older Thai farmer out in the country it would not even make the news!🙄
ᘻᗅᖶᖶᗁᕦᙛ *******
Oh pls cut the bs , you don’t know what killed these people .
Michael *********
ᘻᗅᖶᖶᗁᕦᙛ ᕢᒷᒪᕩᘘ
By the way, many people are lactose-intolerant. So drinking milk will cause an upset stomach, leading to more serious issues.
Michael *********
ᘻᗅᖶᖶᗁᕦᙛ ᕢᒷᒪᕩᘘ
So ... that long-afflicting coronary illness was simply biding its time, waiting for a catalyst (this vaccine) to do him in. Simply a coincidence or correlation, you say?
Human knowledge has refined the art of muddying *science* to no limits.
Not rocket science, it's called a correlation. Correlations don't always equal causation, but sometimes they do. All the article did was identify a correlation.
He didn't die after eating breakfast in the morning, he died after injecting a medicine. Not saying it was the cause, but wouldn't say it has "less than zero to do with it."
Reply to
Garrett ***********
Reply
Paul ********
Calu ***************
what is up with everyone?? If someone (even 1)died from a adverse reaction, that’s horrible...I’m not against the vaccine ..but don’t barrette people putting out info...people of the world 🌎 stop the hate on each other ...on both sides ...that’s my 2 cents ...bye ...
Jamie *******
Fuckwittery is not benign.
My aunt died last year. She ate a dinner every day. Don't eat dinners.
Michael *********
Bobby Howard
British products wreaking havoc globally.
Bobby ********
Jamie Finch. I had an 87 year old aunt a few years ago who had a heart attack whilst shopping in Tesco. My advice is DO NOT shop in Tesco!
Reply to
Bobby ********
Reply
Stephen **********
Monks die every day. It is expected that some will die close to the time they receive the vaccine. That does not mean (but it could mean) the vaccine caused the death. Chance of dying from blood clot 1 in 100,000. Chance of dying from COVID 1 in 100. Chance of getting long COVID once infected: 6 in 10
I would like to know if he had lunch (11-12h) shortly after getting his shot.
If no and went straight to his quarters to rest alone, this may explain why he was found dead roughly four hours later ... and not sooner.
He might have died shortly after retiring to his quarters.
Ivan ************
"The assistant abbot was reported to have had severe diabetes and high blood pressure. He was given a dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine about 10am on Wednesday and was found dead in his quarters about 2pm."
So sick of? Then get vaccinated for "fuckwit" or hypochondria.
Tom *******
Well if you're so smart, tell me what benefit you’re getting from an untested vaccine? You trying to pump your survival rate up from 99.8% to 99.9%? Total nipple. Don't procreate.
ignore him. AstraZeneca vaccines been banned already from 30 countries while still on the list here. Darwinism will take care of those still using the family brain cell.
no - but I have consulted several. My own family doctor, my partner's consultant and a family friend (who is also a consultant). Plus - I listen to medical professionals over and above conspiracy theorists.
Reply to
Steve *********
Reply
Danilo ***********
94 Covid deaths in Thailand — last I checked 3 deaths is less than 94.
Also, I would opt for a Western vaccine since China did not publish their Phase 3 results for Sinovac.
Ivan ************
It's also only so low because it was contained here. They can't open back up without the population vaccinated.
Reply to
Ivan ************
Reply
Steve *********
AFTER - not BECAUSE OF. It's already been determined that he'd have died anyway due to coronary issues.
Let's face it - we will all die AFTER something. My mother died the morning after eating a few spoonfuls of ice cream - I don't blame the ice cream.
How so I don’t know anyone who has had covid I think 78 people died for the whole of thailand why would I get a vaccine for that you are more likely to die in a car accident here than of covid
That’s a misrepresentation of information in an European database that tracks suspected reactions to medicines, including COVID-19 vaccines. The agency behind the database cautions that the information is only of suspected side effects, and that it should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine caused the effects or that it’s unsafe.
That’s a misrepresentation of information in an European database that tracks suspected reactions to medicines, including COVID-19 vaccines. The agency behind the database cautions that the information is only of suspected side effects, and that it should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine caused the effects or that it’s unsafe.
If millions of ppl take the vaccine and only a few got severe side effects or even death, the govt will just ignore and continue using..will only determine it as individual cases just not suitable for this drug
Tom *******
Only an idiot would put highly questionable chemicals into their bodies with a lower rate of success than their own immune system. Either that, or they are mathematically challenged...but still an idiot.
Michael *********
Ronald Tan <--- neither a quack nor a psych. Yet he knows nothing has happened to 99% of the jabbed. Even those 99% of the jabbed cannot say this collectively.
then the govn gotta do everything to prevent the other deaths. Before the injection it is a mandatory to check up for the side effects possibilities. You won't vaccinate a pregnant woman, if the vaccine producer states clearly "deadly for pregnant women". Why would you vaccinate the others but with different illnesses? Tourists must get a paper "fit to fly", why is here no such a paper as "fit for vaccination"?
Common this is still a new drug and therefore need more data to prove who really cannot take the jab. But overall majority 99% who took the jab nothing happens to them.
no, it is not a new one. The vaccine is not "anti" covid but is a supply of "memory" T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes that remember how to Fight the virus in the future. Also it is very common to provide it with special supplies of immune protectors/helpers which will make your immune system stronger. These are very standart vaccines, nothing new about them they are very common in Latin America, Eastern Europe, China and other countries where vaccination is an ok thing. For example in the Ex Sovet Union countries it is advised for elderly to take an "anti" seasonal flu vaccine every August/September. Thats why the death rate from the flu/bacterial pneumonia is very low comparing to the USA where vaccination wasn't allowed for ages. The covid 19 vaccines might be new to the Westerners but they arent new here or in China or in Vietnam, Russia and etc. Thats why I am saying the govn must insist or at least invent these "fit for vaccination" checks.
I'm not a doctor nor a scientist, I just know that currently millions of doses had been administered and majority ppl just don't have a problem with the vaccine, it is up to the professionals to discover who really cannot take the jab and then warn the public...
the majority of people have no problems with Covid 19 too, only 1% had some problems. They had died. But yet we care, but yet we build the walls, we put on these masks and a huge number of measures were invented. That doesnt matter anymore and if the govn really "cares" of people and all these actions were taken not to spend the budget but to protect us and save lives, then they must invent New measures to save another 1%. Thats the point. The vaccine kills no fewer people than the covid itself.
this pandemic came so suddenly, with the vaccine being invented and able to roll out in such a short time,this is already the best scientist can do..what more do you expect? A wonder pill that can put a stop to this virus? Why not you invent one and save the world from more death rather than being here and criticizing the hard work that's been done to prevent more ppl from this virus...😂
some ppl are just allergic to certain drugs, so can you just ignore the effectiveness of the drug if that particular someone who took it and have severe side effects and then banned the drug?
it can only shows that among millions who took the jab, these few ppl who maybe have certain body defects is not suitable for this drug and it is up to the professional to find out what is the similar cause among them which triggers the blood clot therefore warn others with the same problem don't take the jab..
so you can just choose not to get vaccinated, nobody is forcing you to do so..but do remember,there is NO vaccine in the world which is suitable just for everyone without side effects after all we have different bodies.
It's because data shows that the vaccines really WORK therefore countries are implementing the travel rules or whatever..it is just the minority ppl with whatever underlying illness that is not suitable for the jab and this is for them to find out the actual cause for severe side effects and warn the public
So did you yourself do tests to prove it to be inefficient? Or you just read those dunno from where reports on the internet saying it's useless? If it's really useless,you think so many countries will approve usage of it?
Reply to
Ronald *****
Reply
Julian ********
Correlation not necessarily equal to causation. People with little information also feared the polio and flu vaccines when they were first introduced..
who is blindly following who here? The ones with illogical fear and without any actual medical knowledge/training follow each other pretending like they have any valuable insights just because they go out of their way to find a few fringe cases to support their own biases...
I'm not trying to tempt people into doing anything. If someone doesn't want to take the virus, I honestly don't care. I'm actually not in a rush to get one my myself, but will whenever it's easily accessible here. I'm trying to prevent people without any actual medical experience/training from fear mongering just because they found a few instances of the vaccine not working or occasional negative side effects. We all know that it isn't 100% effective. No vaccine has ever been 100% effective
4 monks in one temple but none in another where 151 monks got the same vaccine! Really think more investigation is needed. Did those monks already have covid or some other underlying illness? What about the vaccine administer? Etc etc
not at all. Question everything and then make your own decision. Dont you think its weird that severe reaction is as rare as hens teeth but in 1 temple alone 4 monks have a reaction? In the very same article it then says 151 monks on another temple got the vaccine but nil reactions.
Every vaccine I’ve ever heard of past and present has some absurdly low chance of a death rate, but if 1:100,000 dies from the vaccine does that mean you shouldn’t take the vaccine?
The fact that 4 monks had a reaction, 1 being fatal, means it’s probably more then coincidence. Maybe it wasn’t stored properly or there is some currently unknown reason that will be investigated and discovered.
Confirmation bias isn’t going to do you or anyone else any good 🤷♂️
I specifically said “ITS MORE THEN A COINCIDENCE” and yet your saying that I said them getting sick is “coincidental”
Are you completely illiterate or just have no reading comprehension? Lmfao holy shit this is so stupid you can’t even make this up
Reply to
Jared **********
Reply
Barry **********
Chris Elstob firstly, I'm not telling you or your daughter to do anything. Secondly, research how many people die of blood clots per year under normal circunstances without taking a vaccine. Thirdly, don't say this vaccine is causing blood clots because that hasn't been concluded. It could end up being coincidental
No, Cancer and heart diseases etc didn't take annual leave unfortunately. Look up excess deaths in the UK. That will give you an indication of the difference between average years and since Covid started. SkyNews did a study and the difference is over 100,000 excess deaths. I think I read somewhere that on average over 500,000 people die per year on the UK. The thing with all of this is that it's difficult to be exact on numbers whilst it's still going on. It will take a full review later on to fully understand the true impact
Take the vaccine, or don't take it. The choice is yours. Good luck whatever you decide. Personally, i researched and I had my second dose in January. I'm still alive and kicking.
I have tried to have a reasonable debate with you but I can see you aren't a reason person to debate with. I will therefore leave you to make your decision. As I said, good luck with whatever you decide.
so let me get this straight. You were happy to use a proven vaccine on your kids that must have been tested on countless other people first, to get to a proven status. Then you are condemning me for being one of the people who will eventually end up being one of the people who get the vaccine to be at a proven status that you will then use. You sir are a fekkin joke to human mankind
put it into perspective. 7 people out of 18,000,000 doses given and they haven't concluded if it was a coincidence or an effect of having the vaccine. Do you know how many people die each year of blood clots without taking a vaccine? Do you know how many people in the UK alone have died after contracting Covid? When you do all the math and study all the risks, then make a judgement call as to the decision to have or don't have the vaccine
Lots and lots of articles out there. On what they know about all vaccines, side effects usually happen straight away or within a few months. If you are anti-vax, it's not for me to try to persuade you. Take it, don't take it. I dont really care.