@Tod ********
you gave the info that you had. I think that's the only right thing to do. Denying it all and saying that plans nor possibilities exist until something is published in the Gazette, that would instead have been wrong.
It's not entirely clear to me where this date of June 1st came from (did the journalists fill it in using their fantasy?). But if that date came from any official source, your statement of an upcoming change that would in principle take place (with some level of reservation) by June 1st, was accurate. That is then just the state at that time. If it then doesn't happen by that date, it doesn't mean that the info was not accurate. It means that the state has changed. Things can just change. In fact, I would regard a statement that nothing might happen on June 1st, after the cabinet decided that it actually will, more speculative than just relaying the update as is.
So, no need to feel regret or apologize.