Can someone just confirm that you can only have 2 extensions per calender year on an exempt visa
4,483
views
15
likes
156
all likes
72
replies
1
images
21
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
In Thailand, for those entering on a visa exempt basis, you can typically extend your stay twice in one calendar year: the first extension is for 30 days and the second for 7 days. However, specific rules apply depending on how you enter Thailand (e.g., by air or land), and there are alternatives like the 60-day SETV visa which do not count against the 2 free exemption stamps.
if you haven’t got another visa like a non immigrant visa etc as an Australian I saw Friday that this was it for tourist visa which a lot of people get and then rely on border runs they are now non existent - there’s other visas retirement marriage etc
exactly what I’ve just said 10 mins ago in my other post - lesson don’t get toured visa if you want to stay longer - doesn’t affect me I’ve got marriage visa 😊👍
Your count is totally wrong. You can enter on a 60-days visa exempt, then extend in country for 30 days. You need to leave Thailand, stay abroad for a few days or weeks, after that you can re-enter and will get stamped in for another 60-days visa exempt stay. But this one you can only extend with 7 days, and some people will say that you only get these 7 extra days if you arrived by air (which still needs official conformation). So the total number of stays on visa-exempt entries per calendar year can be less or equal than 157 days
exactly the point Is get the right visa and not cheating the system with border runs etc - go and get the right visa not worry about how good your Maths is lol 😂
you can enter 60 days visa exempt then extend in country 30 days leave thailand and re enter for another 60 days visa exempt but now onky extend to 7 days so total is 157 days
you think it ends there? So if you return home for a while and come back you can't come in? Or if you get visa? There's no actual 157 or 97..day rule. They want to see tourists, not people abusing the system to live here..
I am helping people in this group to understand how visa-exempt entries will get approached by Immigration. I am not here to tell you which visa is best for your purpose of stay. That's not the topic of this thread
terrific I’m just explaining that as long as people do there due diligence and pick the right visa they will be fine - as they want people coming to the country who aren’t going to do border runs etc - I live in thailand on a marriage visa and I know immigration is fed up with those that do
there always was a "rule of thumb" that any stay over 180 days within a rolling 365-days period are proof that you are abusing the tourist visa system for a longstay in Thailand. And this has NOT changed !. . . . . . . This approach is still in effect, and actually I expect that if your intended visa-exempt entry brings the total count over 157 days per calendar year, you will face a problem at the border
again.. The 180 'rule of thumb' only applied to people doing visa runs... If your returning to your home country your obviously regarded differently and this is backed up in the rules because it applies to extensions and people not returning home.. Show me where the 180 rule is clarified? I agree if your entry will be 157 days you will be regarded as trying to stay longterm and will have potential trouble... But the absolute ceiling of 180 days?? I don't that will apply to a genuine tourist returning home and coming back some time later.
you are still wrong. . . I will quit discussing this topic with you now, because you are a blockhead and not willing to learn. You are free to believe in the Fake News that get posted every day, I don't care
the statement was 97 days a year total... This is totally wrong.. Enter twice for 60 days is 120 even without extending. There's no reason as long as return home and do 2 extensions you can't do more.. The guideline referred to people doing boarder runs and doesn't apply here..
Reply to
Martyn ***********
Reply
Jeremy ********
Yes you are correct
You can buy 60 day SETV visas that don’t count against your 2 visa free exemption stamps per year
from what I have read, it's this year they look to. So if you came here 2 times in 2025, you are under scrutiny even if these rules where implemented in November. But if they see you as a genuine tourist, and you have not used extentions 2 times, you will be fine.
John *******
So I went to Thailand in dec last year for 2 months and a border bounce to Cambodia so I had 90 days….went to uk and had 2 months home then returned for 2 months and been home for 5 months….am I at risk of being turned away?
the mouth speaks before the brain engages and then they retract it 60 days you get ok but the extensions are the problem probably better to get a holiday visa now
Reply to
Andrew ***************
Reply
Kevin ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
Regarding extensions
Reply to
Kevin ********
Reply
Maitin *******
That is what immigration had started.
60 + 30. 60 + 7. No extensions on land crossing
Nongnuch ********
There are no new "visa rules" or a new law.
What has changed, mandated from above, is the strict monitoring of the number of visa-exempt entries and the check for "visa runs" (actually they meant to say "back-to-back border runs").
The new approach taken by border officials is intended to ensure that the option to do a "visa run" is not abused.
You can only extend a visa-free entry twice per calendar year.
The first visa-exempt entry can be extended by 30 days, but the second can only be extended by 7 days.
60 + 30 + 60 + 7 = 157 days maximum per year... regardless of whether you arrive by air or land.
Only these two extensions are possible per calendar year (!).
Visa-exempt entries themselves are not limited, even though some believe that unlimited visa-free entries are possible by air. This is simply not true.
Visa-exempt entries are not limited to two entries per calendar year. This is a misconception, and some agents spread this information to make profit from panicked people. Some agents are warning that you should not believe FAKE NEWS telling you that visa-exempt entries are limited to two per calendar year.
Under certain circumstances, but always at the individual discretion of the border official, multiple visa-exempt entries are possible, like four, five or even more, if you don’t abuse the system.
In this case, however, the entry history in your passport and on the immigration central computer must prove that your stays were short-term holidays like 2-4 weeks, and the total annual stay must not exceed 157 days (some will say not exceed 179 days)
And there should be several weeks or months between each stay. Your best proof of not abusing the system is when you can show that you returned to your home country between each visa-exempt stay.
The intended aim of the new regulations was to prohibit "visa runs," where you only entered briefly a neighboring country and then immediately re-entered.
You must be able to prove the planned short stay at the immigration counter—for example, with proof of onward travel or a return journey, such as a flight ticket.
I suspect (but cannot guarantee!) that a border official would consider you being a "genuine" tourist based on such short holiday trips within a year. In that case, they expect to see on their central computer that you never extended – i.e. maximized – any of these short trips.
The 7-day extension is a REAL extension. It's not the same as the stamp "application for extension denied, you have 7 days to leave the Kingdom"
At least, that's how I've interpreted the changes after following official announcements and personal accounts for many days. However, I'm still not guaranteeing its accuracy.
What has become crystal clear is that "per year" is defined as "per calendar year."
Those who want to be on the safe side should obtain a single-entry tourist visa in advance for stays of up to 60 days, with the option to extend for 30 more days.
Someone entering on single-entry tourist visas plus two extensions, with a few months interval between each stay, is good to go for a maximum of “touristic” 180 days "per a 1-year period" (not per calendar year – as this is calculated differently)
I have visited Thailand three times this year on visa exempt and visiting again 28th December. All my visits are two weeks at a time with a return ticket, my four visits will add up to 58 days in total. No way in the world they will restrict visitors like me, the two visa exempt rule per year is for people abusing the system trying to stay in Thailand long term without applying for a proper long term visa.
correct. If you can always show proof of onward travel after a short stay, you are good to go, unless you have reached the mark of a total of 157 days visa-exempt stays within a calendar year
this seemingly is wrong, as I have already seen such 7-days extension stamps and they were issued after having entered though a land border . . Yet I believe we need more confirmations from official accounts on this . . it still is murky and unclear
Reply to
Nongnuch ********
Reply
Todd *********
literally nobody can truly confirm this for sure yet. But i would defer to stuart above if concerned
That 7 days only on second extension is very smart move by Thai immigration, basically it says you got enough time to pack your bags and leave Thailand
The 7-day extension is a REAL extension. It's not the same as the stamp "application for extension denied, you have 7 days to leave the Kingdom", even if to some people it looks like a “grace period”. I have already seen the stamp of a 7-days extension, it takes up half of a passport page, whilst the "you have 7 days to leave" stamp is as small as the entry stamp
I think you are wrong . . . 60 + 30 + 60 + 7 = 157 days total maximum per year, and only two extensions per calendar year . . . . . . . . regardless of whether you arrive by air or land. Visa exempt entries are NOT limited - it rather depends on how long you stretch each visa-exempt stay
All right, we will have to wait and see until this is clarified through actual practice. Two consecutive visa-exempt entries, regardless of whether you arrive by air or by land, appear to be acceptable. However, as I understand it, extensions are reserved for entries by air only — although I certainly hope you turn out to be correct.
Stuart says no extension for land border entries, and I am willing to believe him. It means I need to change my prepared text . . .I however posted the SAME text in Thai Visa Advice, and neither Robert nor Tod have contradicted
it's not how I read the new guidelines. My take is that extensions are no longer permitted if the person has a history of border run style behaviour. Applied equally to land and air (a border run is a border run after all). Having said that we're going to have to wait and see how it pans out
I’m currently not in Thailand so I can’t confirm that’s the practice that’s currently happening but that’s what they’ve said will happen. In a couple of weeks I can confirm for sure but let’s see the comments on here to see what’s playing out.