I (Dutchman and 67) want to go to Thailand for cycling in December for 90 days. So confused about which visa I must have. Some say that you can be stopped at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam, because you have a Non-O visa for 90 days, while 60 days is the maximum.
Then there is the question: do I buy a flightticket for 90 days, while there is the risk that Thailand does not allow people with a visa for three months, but only 30 or 60 days? I want to be sure that I can buy a ticket with the guarantee that I, as a tourist, am welcome in Thailand. I can show that my income is sufficient.
I have been in Thailand several times, but only for one month. Now that I am retired I can -and want - to stay there for a longer time. Never problems with a visa at arrival, but now I don’t know anymore. I hear so many confusing things about visas.