The discussion highlights various pros and cons of the Marriage Non-O Visa in Thailand, particularly in comparison to the DTV visa. Pros include lower financial requirements for bank deposits and a streamlined process with fewer paperwork hassles. However, cons focus on the obligation of marriage and recurring challenges during yearly renewals, along with personal anecdotes regarding tax implications and other experiences from expats.
will you lose 30% due to that you get married and she takes it or somebody else is taking it because if somebody else is taking it you're a fool to allow it to happen
not only in Thailand. Immigration here sometimes do that when you apply for your green card, too. They actually send their agents to your house to check your bedroom, your resident-to see if you’re really married. Many of my friends got ‘unexpected’ knocking at their doors, random times, to see if you are really living together. Yeah, not counting the interviews. Luckily, I never had to experience that kind of issues.
I thought I was the only one that felt that way. Every year you think it is going to be easier and they toss another curve ball. This year it was that my rental agreement with the owner did not specify an annual change in amount...even though the owner is our cousin and the amount was never an object. Many times we even left a figure off the contract. Suddenly, this is an issue. One time, it was that we didn't have a pic of us in our bedroom, another time, we had the same clothes on in the first and last pic. There's always something.
I am not married but friends are. You have to take photos of being together in different rooms and outside the house. They seem to send you away if they don’t have enough evidence or when you renew again you haven’t taken the right picture.
Reply to
Neil ********
Reply
Frazer ************
As someone married to a Thai, I decided to go with the DTV visa instead of the Non-O marriage visa—and here’s why:
No Need to Deposit 400,000 Baht: With the DTV visa, I don’t have to put 400,000 baht in a Thai bank every year or keep it locked there for months at a time, just to keep my visa status.
Much Less Paperwork: The Marriage Visa (Non-O) comes with a ton of paperwork—house checks, immigration officers visiting for photos, endless forms and requirements. With the DTV visa, I only have to show 500k YHB of funds once, and that money can stay in my home country bank account. After I’ve provided proof, I can use those funds however I want, whether that’s for investments, crypto, or whatever else.
Tax Benefits: If you plan your stay right, you can spend 10–11 months in Thailand every rolling 12-month period, but never more than 6 months in a single calendar year. That way, you avoid becoming a tax resident in Thailand. As a Brit, I don’t end up a tax resident in the UK either, so it’s a win-win on tax for my online income.
Built-in Excuse for Travel: The DTV visa naturally requires a trip outside Thailand every 6 months, which means I get to tell my wife I “have to” take a short holiday twice a year!
Flexible with Banks and Payments: I already have Thai banking from when I held a Non-B visa, but if those accounts get closed due to stricter rules in the future, it’s not the end of the world. There are lots of options for payments and banking these days—a Thai account isn’t really essential anymore.
In Summary: Comparing Non-O (marriage) to DTV, DTV wins for me—less paperwork, fewer headaches, better tax situation, and no need to tie up my savings in a Thai bank. I’m happy sticking with this route for now, and who knows, maybe in a few years I’ll look at the Non-O again.
If you’re married to a Thai and don’t want the red tape and restrictions of the marriage visa, the DTV is definitely worth considering!
No, your marital status does not qualify you for a DTV. You need to be a digital nomad or sign up for a qualifying soft power course. muay thai, cooking etc
I fail to see how you can spend 10-11 months inside Thailand every rolling 12 month period and avoid being a Thai tax resident. If you spend 180 days or more inside Thailand in any calendar year you are automatically a tax resident. So if you spend 358 consecutive days in Thailand straddling 2 years (179×2), you would then have to remain outside of Thailand for the remainder of that 2nd year which would be 186 days.
Greg ******
Have you stayed past the 180 day mark yet? Please post a positive result.
Yes, but not every time. I had house visits 4 times out of 5 extensions. I'm now on a DTV. I don't have to worry about immigration for 5 years :)
Reply to
Ian **********
Reply
Aaron ***********
Oh, I didn’t realize you were restricted to being there only six months per year. I thought it was six months per visit and you could leave for a few days and come back? And you have the opportunity to extend that six months without leaving one time in the five year period.
he is over 60 and isn’t planning to leave Thailand. Not sure if he would like the fact that he has to leave every 6 months. Well, may be visiting surrounding countries. The banking part isn’t a problem, but more of which route is the easiest. I have dual citizenship and still have my family in Bangkok, therefore, staying isn’t a problem for me. Health insurance is also another thing that we will have to tackle, but right now, I am just thinking whether he’d be better off doing plain retirement or marriage visa.
yeah it’s not for everyone — these are just my personal reasons for choosing the DTV. If I wanted to stay in Thailand permanently without leaving each year, then a marriage or retirement visa would make more sense. If he can afford the retirement option, that’s definitely the way to go, since it doesn’t depend on another person’s emotions. Long term i will move onto a Marriage visa too, DTV is just a good option for me right now while i like to travel alot and want to avoid Tax where i can plus want to be able to invest the 400k that would need to be sitting in a bank
I might try the same…. I got my 90 d NonO but now not 100% about 12 month ext. based on marriage. Will come home after 85 days then re-apply for DTV as my company are happy for me to work remote.
A google search tells me this about finances. Eligibility and requirements
Financial: A minimum balance of 500,000 Thai Baht in a savings or checking account is required. Credit and investment accounts are not accepted. Some embassies may have higher requirements.
don’t know how true this is, but I have heard from many people that a Thai citizenship is extremely difficult to get, I’ve also been told that one of the requirements is that you must be able to read and Write Thai weather you are applying as a long-term resident or applying as a result of being married to a Thai. Both require the ability to read and write in Thai language.
Honestly, the only real downside for me is that the five years spent on a DTV visa don’t count towards the five years you need to apply for Thai citizenship. If I ever really had the opportunity, I’d even consider giving up my British citizenship to become Thai, even though dual citizenship isn’t an issue for British nationals or Thais. I know a good friend from the UK who managed to get Thai citizenship after living here for 20 years, so I know it’s possible—it’s just not an easy path.
That said, citizenship isn’t a big deal for me in the long run. If anything, I’d want it just because I feel a genuine love and patriotic connection to Thailand—probably even more than my home country at this point. But I’m honestly not concerned about the perks like being able to own property in my own name or having access to every job. I run my online businesses and have no interest in taking jobs that are restricted for foreigners, and if I did ever want to invest in property here, I could do it through my Thai-registered company.
In reality, given how difficult citizenship is to get (even after five years on a non-immigrant visa you’re only just eligible to start the process, and that’s still a long road), it’s not something I’m losing sleep over. I’m still fairly young, so even if I do a few years on this DTV visa and then later switch to a non-immigrant visa, it’s not going to make a big difference. If I end up trying for citizenship 10, 15, or even 20 years from now, missing a couple of years at the start isn’t really going to matter much. In the end, for me, being able to live and work here happily is what really counts.