This is NOT an official government website. We are an independent resource providing information and assistance to travelers.

Do DTV holders need to provide proof of ongoing activities when re-entering Thailand?

Dec 13, 2025
a day ago
Lots of strong opinions on here, backed up with zero official info. Nowhere does it state that you always need a course to go back to when you leave and re-enter every 6 months. You might feel like that sounds like it should be the case, but we’re not here asking how you feel. We need official word, but we’re not likely to get it.. so we’re left with assumptions and hopes. The only thing that can guide us is other DTV holders experiences. Too much hostility on here, we’re all just trying to figure out Thailand’s bureaucracy ✌️
3,583
views
29
replies
0
images
13
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
There is debate among DTV visa holders regarding whether proof of ongoing activities (like courses) is required upon re-entry to Thailand. Some parliamentarians argue there is no official requirement for continuous activities, while others emphasize the possibility of immigration discretion and random checks. Personal experiences vary, with some encountering requests for documentation and others not. Ultimately, the lack of clear rules creates uncertainty, and travelers are advised to carry relevant paperwork to avoid complications.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
Anonymous ******************
You have a visa with a goal ( soft activity ), of course the immigration may ask you to prove your soft activity 😆, same for work activity.

Probability now to be stopped/asked ? 0.01% ( depending of some red flag ).
Greg ********
You can only act on current practice which is no ongoing courses or activity are required if you are entering the country. Anyone guessing that may change is doing just that, guessing.
Justin ********
Some of us were granted on a dental appointment, so the people with their stupid theories honestly sound very ridiculous. It was very obvious at the time of applying I couldn't be visiting the dentist non-stop for drilling new cavities 5 years. They could have rejected it and said so, but did not. Obviously there never was a real requirement of repeating the same activity for 5 long years.
Luit *****************
I did ask embassy and did ask Immigration office and both confirmed all visa requirements are in place the whole valid period of the visa. When you read official info at e-visa site, there also is no remark indicating the opposite.
Muay ******************
People's opinions are divided over weather further courses are required or not but one thing is certain, some people are worried and would prefer the peace of mind in having something to demonstrate on going study. My gym is currently working on a DTV plus program for our customers that are anxious about reentry.
Allan **************
You maybe right about it not saying you need a course but does it say you can come in with out a course. This is Thailand so they can ask anything they want to at immigration. Up to you how you answer them.
Luit *****************
@Allan *************
Exactly, and you got a visa granted because you needed to stay in Thailand for a purpose, in this case a course. When course is ended you have no reason anymore to enter Thailand.
Anonymous ******************
@Allan *************
Exactly. No requirement but also nothing saying you don't need to show anything. IO discretion.
Allan **************
Anonymous participant 376 .Same as showing money in the bank 500,000 or the 20,0000 in cash they can ask you to show them .But that's part of the beauty of Thailand is the unpredictability of it when you live here.
Luit *****************
@Allan *************
It is not typical for Thailand, most countries do not intensively check people entering the country on visa.
Allan **************
@Luit ****************
like people saying that the DTV is for 5 years No it's not it's only valid for as long as the Government says it is .
Bob **********
There’s no official word,what do you think ?? Immagration is going to just stamp you in 3 years down the line ,I personally know immigration does not like the soft power side of the DTV and they can do whatever they like holding a visa is no automatic entry into Thailand so good luck
Anonymous ******************
I would say the best approach is to check how other visas are handled what is required, for whom, and what kinds of crackdowns are being enforced. The DTV is relatively new and was backed by the former government, which left only a couple of months ago. You can’t rely on temporary trends or on the experiences of people who have entered only a small number of times. It’s important to balance the risks. I’ve made numerous entries on another visa before eventually being randomly checked and required to show the relevant documents. Checks can happen based on targeting, but also at random. Will your documents be checked? Possibly yes there may be no formal requirement, but there is also nothing stating that you won’t be asked to show them. IO have full discretion on entries. That’s Thailand.
Ian **********
Anonymous participant 376 Immigration do not like the DTV because it was a creation of the MFA. I fully expect it to be revised in the near future
Luit *****************
@Ian *********
I can understand they are not happy with is, far too much possibilities to abuse it.
Dany ********
Anonymer Teilnehmer 376 so how many times have people on marriage or retirement visa been asked to show proof of finances when entering the country? 😜😜 its not beeing checked at all.
Luit *****************
@Dany *******
The check on marriage or retirement visa on entry would be a bit superfluous, because these people are yearly checked when they extend.

A lot of them don't even travel in and out.

DTV is a lot different, no yearly extension, so no checkpoints other than on entry.
Shaughn ***********
@Dany *******
in regards to marriage and retirement visas, they go through the checks at foreign embassy’s when people apply for it as they need to supply the required bank statements. Thai immigration do their yearly checks when it’s extension time. So correct, there’s zilch checking at the border for those visa holders.
Anonymous ******************
@Dany *******
I'm not specifically talking about proof of finances. But thanks for your comment. People on marriage and retirement face yearly scrutinity when renewing their visa with bank balance to be maintained for months plus random visits from immigration; that's definitely stricter than the DTV.
Dany ********
Anonymer Teilnehmer 376 well you are cherry picking if you are not also looking at those visa and the applied checks ;) didnt you say that we should look at other visa how they are handled? lol

and this is about entry into the country and not the extension. the visa extension for the DTV is super similar to extension of stay for a retirement visa. so they can be compared very good ;) how do i

know? all my neighbors and also

many friends extend their retirement visa every year. and i also extended my DTV, so i can very well compare both ;)
Anonymous ******************
@Dany *******
Well, congrats on renewing your DTV, but 99% of applicants don’t, because they can’t meet the relevant immigration requirements. Do Non-immigrant have the choice to not show documents to renew their visa?! No, they don't. How can you guarantee these visas won’t be subject to checks then? You’re focusing on two non-immigrant visas that are barely checked at the border, while others such as ED visas are scrutinized much more closely. Mine was Non-B and I got checked as well.

You need to consider the bigger picture, not just the examples that support your argument. These are different visas with different requirements, and understanding them gives you a broader idea of what you can expect from immigration that’s my point.

If you read me carefully, I’m not confirming anything; I’m simply advising caution.
Dany ********
Anonymer Teilnehmer 376 but you are the one who is cherry picking 🤣🤣 while non-o/oa is probably the most used longterm visa. i bet LTR and Elite arent checked either.

i had multiple ED, not a single issue. same anecdotal evidence as your non-b story ;)

plus the fact that no DTV holder is requested to proof finances on entry so far. nor to show a workcation employment proof from the company. only anonymous anecdotes.

so i think the bigger picture is pretty clear actually.
Anonymous ******************
You clearly didn’t read my initial comment. I’m not affirming anything. I’m simply suggesting caution. You’re the one claiming there is, and will be, no check for people. Non-immigrants visa are renewed yearly with immigration but some are still subject to checks. Betting on a zero check for the DTV is a dangerous one; mostly when some are going to use it for 5 years without visiting immigration at all. That’s no different from those who confidently said opening/maintaining a bank account would be easy for DTV holders, as if they were holding a crystal ball. "Your ED with no issue" is indeed very anecdotal when reading recent news.
Toni *******
There is a sign at the laos FB4 border stating dtv holders should have the paperwork with them, so it might start happening soon. I wasnt asked anything tho (3 days ago) Im workcation not soft power, but the picture posted here was true. Altho, the paper I saw, was white A4 next to the window where they stamp you. It also said onward ticket, which doesnt make any sense... but then again this is thailand 😅
Sefton ********
Thailand leaves everything grey and uncertain.. Its been this way for decades.

The expectation of clear consistent rules and messaging, then applied cleanly in all places to all people is simply not going to happen.
Greg ********
@Sefton *******
Every country is the same in that not everything is black and white. I have had a couple of talks with a British Consular Officer over this over a drink and football (before visa processing outsourced). I wanted to take my Thai friend to a wedding in London so was asking (This was not Thailand) for info. They leave much to discretion for a reason. PS: in the end we did not apply. The father of the bride was a British Ambassador but we thought too much hassle to apply.
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Greg *******
yup. I’ve given up on the idea it’s all too vague
Greg ********
Anonymous participant It is just a case of dealing with the situation as it is and realising it is fluid like many things here.