I apologize for asking a question that has likely been posted many times before but can somebody briefly explain why a one-year non O retirement visa with multiple entry is better than a five-year DTV? Are you more scrutinized and/or more closely observed if you get a DTV? I’m still not certain of this. Thank you.
TLDR : Answer Summary
The discussion centers on the advantages of a one-year Non-O retirement visa over the five-year DTV visa. Key points highlight that the Non-O visa does not require the holder to leave Thailand, has less stringent documentation requirements for extensions, and provides more stability for long-term residency. In contrast, the DTV is viewed as a less suitable option with restrictions similar to a tourist visa, hindering capabilities such as legal residency year-round, banking, and obtaining a long-term driving license. Concerns about the uncertain future of the DTV visa are also expressed.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES