Do I need to show bank statements and take an ATK test for the first 90-day reporting in Thailand?

@Steven **************

- hers was correct information. Your confusion is on you. I suggest you do better to try to avoid it next time, and don't be so sensitive.

@Scot ******

. Attacks? Dont be so sensitive..

Incorrect information can cause nightmares when it comes to thai immigration. Personal experience means nothing unless you've used same office . I only use Bangkok imm so I only reply to questions about Bkk imm

I suggest you both do the same to avoid confusion.

@Steven **************

- yep, she just gave our experience. The attacks were not called for.

@Scot ******

. Your experience is based on an immigration office that they are not going to. This is the problem with regional offices, they make their own rules.

@Steven **************

- that wasn't your reply. You should have made that point early on instead of the attack.

@Bon***

. Post mentions Muang Thong Thani, they have nothing to do with retirement extensions. Why would they check the funds in bank for 90 days when they have nothing to do with that extension and don't process them?

This is why everyone else is saying there is no need because they won't be at MTT doing their extension.

@Gareth *******

- it that what you do when you are triggered? Did you also wet yourself?

@Scot ******

I just realised it was your mother’s post that I originally replied to. Good to see you sticking to your family values.

@Gareth *******

- you are the triggered one. Do you want to talk about it?

@Scot ******

you’re obviously sensitive.

@Gareth *******

- yep, and that's the reply. She noted it was separate. You are incorrect, and were rude I'm guessing because you thought it would be fun. Was it fun?

@Bonnie ******

. I understand that but it was funds check in relation to 90 day report, funds check of 90 daysfor yearly extension is obvious. Again.. MTT play no part in yearly extensions, it's not their department.

@Scot ******

incorrect he asked IF he had to show funds for the 90 day address report, simple answer is no.

@Steven **************

the post is asking about the funds check so there is a funds check involved in his case.

@Steven **************

- Jomtien.

@Scot ******

. Which imm office was that at.?

@Darren ******

- and yes, both 90 day periods started the exact same day.

@Darren ******

- you keep connecting it to the 90 day report, that's your error. They do want to see our money in the bank after 90 days from the issue of the extension.

@Scot ******

I've never known of anyone to show fund at the 90 day report as that's done when getting the visa and/or applying for an extension. And to be honest, I also doubt that you were asked for proof of funds at your 90 day report unless you also applied for an extension or a new visa on the same day.

Either way, this conversation is pretty pointless so I bid you farewell. Have a good evening.

@Steven **************

- great, that's nice for you. Seems it's not always the same now doesn't it?

@Darren ******

- you are the only one who keeps saying that. How can we dispel you of your confusion?

In our case at the 1st 90 days, as is the case for the op, we do have to do the 90 day reporting, and show our funds. He may have to as well, he did ask after all.

@Scot ******

. MTT doesn't handle retirement extensions, they do 90 day reports and tourist extensions. I've done 90 day reports at MTT during money in bank period, including the day before applying for yearly extension at CW, and it's NEVER been mentioned or checked.by officer processing it.

@Scot ******

I'm currently stuck on your interpretation of still thinking you have to show the money when talking about the 90 day report actually means you don't need to show the money. Maybe you could help explain your thinking on that point.

@Darren ******

- that would still be your confusion. Can you point to the word you are stuck on?

@Scot ******

likewise, which part of still thinking you need to show you have the money when talking about the 90 day report is confusing you?

@Darren ******

- which part of not part of reporting is confusing you?

@Steven **************

- yep, nothing was said otherwise, but it may still need to be done.

@Scot ******

looks like she has based on now I'm reading it.

@Scot ******

. Might be relevant to you, but NOT the person asking the question. Checking funds are in bank for 90 days and doing a 90 day report are 2 different things.

@Darren ******

- she didn't say you did.

@Steven **************

- the 90 day report is not the same as immigration checking your funds at the 90 day point. The guy asked about the funds check, it certainly is relevant in our case. End of story. 😉

@Scot ******

the only relevance a 90 day report has to an extension is you need a current valid one to apply for a non o extension, end of story, unless you haven't been in Thailand 90 days when you apply for the extension, then it's not needed at all because the stamp in your passport shows you haven't.

@Bonnie ******

you don't need to show any money or bank statements when doing your 90 day report.

@Steven **************

- it's the way it worked for us, so I would consider it personal experience.

@Bonnie ******

. Opinions mean nothing when it comes to immigration laws.. ive done ten 90 day reports and never needed to show funds. And your opinions about coincidence being close to extension is also false as 90 days resets if you exit and re enter country. Let someone who has personal experience and proof answer.

@Gareth *******

Read it again!

@Bon***

wrote "It's not part of the reporting".

As English isnt you first language which bit dont you understand?

@Gareth *******

- you best do that yourself. She says it's not part of the reporting.

@Scot ******

you obviously have no grasp of English. Re read her post she mentions reporting.