Can I use my bank statements showing 19,100 SGD for the DTV Workcation Visa application despite not meeting the 500,000 THB requirement yet?

Nov 14, 2024
a month ago
Based on the requirement of a bank savings balance of at least 500,000THB (or equivalent) from the last two months' statements, does anyone know the exact exchange rate for this amount in SGD?

My consolidated bank statements from the past two months show only a total of 19,100SGD. At today's exchange rate, it would amount to only 497000THB. I have additional savings in another account that would bring the total to 500,000THB. However, if I transfer the balance internally within this week, it won't reflect on my statements until the end of the month. Since I plan to submit my DTV Workcation Visa application within this week, would the 19,100 SGD from the past two months' statement be acceptable? Can anyone advise, thank you!
621
views
1
likes
10
all likes
5
replies
0
images
6
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
A user is asking whether their current bank statements, which show 19,100 SGD equivalent to 497,000 THB, would be sufficient for a DTV Workcation Visa application given the requirement of a minimum bank balance of 500,000 THB. They have additional savings in another account but the internal transfer won't reflect until the end of the month. Several commenters suggest providing statements from multiple accounts, emphasizing the need to meet the 500,000 THB requirement and advising on strategies like presenting transaction lists or maintaining a margin in exchange rates.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
Luit *****************
Better not calculate with exact exchange rate, but use a good margin.
Pete *******
You have to find out what the seasoning requirements are from the Embassy you are applying to. No one else can tell you.
Amber *********
You can often print transaction list for parts of the month. You could have your bank do it and stamp it.
Wesley ********
You can show 2 statements from 2 accounts , that total over 500k
John *******
If it is not 500k, then no.