Ok here goes.im a bit of a thick ... about this visa thing. Been coming to thailand for a few years now on stamp on arrival staying from 1 month to 3 months after getting an extention.the last 2 times ive arrived i have been asked a couple ov questions of how long i stay this time at airport.im 62 but all i want to do is holiday for anything from 1 month to 2 months twice a year.im abit confused which is best visa to obtain without being questioned.there is a possibility i could get married to a thai lady but i still only want to do the usual travel times even if married.pls no negative comments just need a pointer which way is best..thx all
Answer summary
The user is seeking advice on which visa to obtain for holidays in Thailand, having traveled on a stamp on arrival in the past. They are confused about the best visa type given potential limitations on stay durations and the possibility of marriage. Various community members suggest options like the tourist visa for shorter stays, the Non-O visa for longer periods due to age, and using the eVisa portal for convenience. They mention the importance of correctly addressing stay durations to avoid questioning at immigration.
41 repliesnewest first
29
Click comment and we will ask for your email, then OTP, then name.
Osian ********
If u got the funds in bank 19k, u could apply for a non-o each time u travel, giving u 3 months each time
Miyamoto Musashi, your response is exactly the sort of response that isn’t required. I hope that that the moderator sees it and kicks you off. Your attitude stinks.
For a month, visa exempt if your country is on the list. At the moment it's still 60 days I think, maybe someone knows if it has been gazetted yet. Otherwise a SETV for 60days. Or a Non -O retirement visa for 90 days if you have 3 months proof of
If you limit yourself to 1 or 2 months twice a year you should be fine to continue with visa exempt, although if it drops to 30 days as proposed you will need an extension so it might be easier to get either a tourist visa or a 90 day Non-O visa each time before travelling. However you also mention extending your visa exempt entries and that implies stays of longer than 2 months, which is why you will be getting questioned. If you're staying 3 months twice a year get the 90 day Non-O based on being over 50 each time
Recommend you go to the Official Thai Government WEB site look at all the different visas and see what you qualify for and what best fits your needs. Possibly a Non-O or SETV
At the moment , depending which country you are from , you are probably entitled to à 60 day visa exempt which can be extended by 30 days ( once a year). More than the 1 or 2 months that you wrote.
The thai government has decided to reduce the 60 days in question to 30 days but it is not in force yet. When it is you can still request 1 time 30 day extension. The second extension in a year is limited technically to 7 days.
Having said that, asking questions is thailand's right.if you didn't overstay in the past you should be able to explain your situation easily
A single entry tourist visa is good for 60 days and if needed you could get a 30 day extension. Or get a non O visa based on retirement is actually less money. Single entry non O is $80USD and you get 90 days. A single entry tourist is $40USD but then the extension is ฿1,900 is about $58USD.
Unfortunately, despite what people are saying about immigration only targeting people that are “abusing the system,” plenty of legitimate are getting refused entry.
Any time you come in on a tourist visa, it’s a risk now. Since you are over 50, I suggest you get a single entry NON-O each time you come. It’s good for 3 months per entry.
It also let you open a Thai bank account if you don’t already have one. For some reason they think a 3 month NON-O is a long term visa and a 5 year DTV is a tourist visa. Makes no sense but whatever.
Dante Its because most people use the Non-O visa to come to Thailand and after to 90 days get the 12 month extension of stay. Understand that with the Non-O and Non-OA visas once they expire you remain in Thailand on 12 month extensions of stay that you renew annually. Completely different from a DTV visa.
Steven L. Daugherty the issue is that tourists with the specific visa appropriate for tourists coming multiple times a year are being turned away from Thailand even though they have the correct visa for their trip.
The solution is to pretend to be retirees in Thailand .
The whole “get the right visa for your trip” thing is nonsense and always has been a passive aggressive way of older people telling younger people that they are unwelcome.
Graham Seal Times change, Thai immigration attitudes change. Its currently better to get the specific visa that corresponds to your specific current actual situation and plans, and leave other options on the table for later if your plans change. Thai immigration has gotten quite picky this past year.
The non-O is for people intending to stay longer and get an extension of stay such as retirement, marriage etc and I know of people who have been refused a new O-visa because they were just getting them for longer stays and not for extension like you are saying. Admittedly these people were using them a lot and it was a while ago but with the recent crackdowns I don't think it would be less likely to have problems. The issue is that if you want to try and they later refuse to issue a non-O then it's going to make it very difficulle to change to a retirement or marriage visa and you need the O-visa to do that.
Malcolm Whitlock I have been getting two Non-Os per year for many years and never once have I taken an extension and never questioned by the Embassy when applying or Immigration on entry. The extension is not mandarory as your post suggests.