Ask question
This is NOT an official government website. We are an independent resource providing information and assistance to travelers.

What are the experiences and opinions on the DTV visa for Thailand?

Apr 8, 2026
22 days ago
*EDIT* - As some of you seem to lack the ability to read, I'll write it again here. This post was for INFORMATION only of an experience, that's it. If you want to argue, please do so elsewhere.

Just wanted to share my experience at BKK this afternoon - I have the DTV for workcation (online business) and have been travelling around South East Asia for the past year or so and have many stamps in and out of countries. The immigration officer (female) initially scoffed at my visa and I was escorted for questioning - after completing a passenger statement & a conversation with a very nice/polite immigration officer (male) I was allowed to continue into Thailand as normal.

He advised me that DTV holders should only stay for 3-4 months, not the full 6 months each time, as people should use the visa for travel.

UK passport holder - travelling in a couple (only female took for questioning not male).

Travelled from Vietnam to BKK (many others in the immigration holding also seemed to have travelled from Vietnam too).

*This is for information of my experience only - this group has a habit of fear mongering unfortunately but if you have the visa for the correct purpose then you should have no issues.*
7,832
views
199
all likes
55
replies
22
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
A user shared their personal experience at Bangkok immigration with a Digital Work Visa (DTV), highlighting mixed reactions from officers regarding the visa's intended use and stay duration. The immigration officer suggested that DTV holders should ideally travel and not stay the full 6 months allowed on the visa, which sparked a debate among commenters questioning the validity of the officer's advice against the official guidelines. Some comments express concerns about the misuse of the DTV visa as a form of residency, while others defend the user's account and criticize the perceived fear-mongering behavior in the group.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
Ian **********
...and you were stamped in for 6 months :D
Like
Reply
Christopher ***********
Troll post. 100% BS.
Like
Reply
Anonymous ******************
They are getting stricter with DTVs. What was considered impossible by some experts here is now getting a bit more probable. As for other visa types (ED).
Like
Reply
Greg ********
Anonymous participant 242 Well that is not anonymous and I have met that guy so I know he exists :-)
Like
Reply
Reply to
Greg ********
Reply
Mark *************************
The male officer has given such advice because he knows many other officers would look at staying the full 6 months in a different way. Its not a law written in stone, but it is good advice nevertheless because he knows better. Since when advising became fear mongering? Do what you want with your 6 months but be prepared for re-entry. Some people are cupid stunts with their heads so high up their poophole. SMFH.
Like
Reply
Anonymous ******************
@Mark ************************
Correct. Some people here still think immigration is here to stamp your passport and say enjoy your stay only. For these, it's or 100% of people getting checked or none, zero balance. They are funny.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous ******************
Reply
Robert *******
So you are not scaremongering but just telling that you hate females doing their job.

Thanks, as you are free in life choices, avoid any female contact.
Like
Reply
Ben ******
@Robert ******
they are more moody and ask many questions at immigration I've noticed, its true, especially avoid the fat ones they are nasty pieces of work
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Robert ******
when did I say anything about hating a female? You are also free in life choices so maybe read the full post before commenting next time.
Like
Reply
Robert *******
Anonymous participant The immigration officer (female) initially scoffed

a very nice/polite immigration officer (male)

travelling in a couple (only female took for questioning not male).

And all misgendered?
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Robert ******
again, providing context for my experience. In future I will just allow people to ask questions about everything instead.

The term misgenered also means that someone has been labelled with the incorrect gender. This was my experience therefore I have the information of who was involved in the situation.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Sefton ********
Always anon accounts isnt it ??

I dont think the group should allow anon and alias's any more.
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Sefton *******
what has an anonymous post got to do with anything here? Again just simply posted for information, if it's irritating for you, maybe just don't read it 🤷🏼‍♀️
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Anonymous ******************
This visa is flawed af
Like
Reply
Maximus ************
Immigration making their own rules. This is a 5 year visa with which you can bring ‘dependants’ on. Imagine putting kids in a school and then be denied entry…. 🤦‍♂️
Like
Reply
Greg ********
Maximus guanteenus Immigration officers have discretion. Even the MFA clearly state that on their own website. As for schools that is why many insist the kids have an Ed visa instead of the DTV
Like
Reply
Reply to
Greg ********
Reply
Anonymous ******************
It’s just like on Reddit. You’ve posted this several times using a newly created account
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
Anonymous participant 376 I'm not bored enough to use Reddit unfortunately but thank you for the pointless comment.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Sam *********
Annonomousssssss
Like
Reply
Gerry ********
There definitely seems to be a pattern forming here. Avoid the female immigration officers 🤔 😅
Like
Reply
LongTimeLivi************
This story doesn’t match Thai immigration rules. The DTV visa allows 180 days per entry, extendable to 360 days and not just 3–4 months. Immigration officers don’t give casual advice that contradicts published regulations. They admit or refuse entry based on the law. Don’t let fear mongering confuse you.
Like
Reply
Anonymous ******************
LongTimeLivingInThailand Published regulations? Which ones? The ones also saying its easy to extend in-country?
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
LongTimeLivingInThailand this is not a 'story' - it is my own experience that I am sharing for information only.

I understand the visa guidelines, this is simply what he said to me. I never said it was an official rule or guideline.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Anonymous ******************
I guess what the immigration officer meant to stay 3-4 months not the full 6 months each time is not to use the visa as a resident visa and stay 360 days in a year inside Thailand. I guess the immigration are realising people are bound to use the visa and stay inside Thailand for 5 years. Remember this visa was introduced by the previous political regime, and I guess there will be changes implemented in the future once there are more cases of people actually living full 360 days on this visa. By filling the passenger declaration they are also collecting data on people staying the whole majority of the year inside Thailand.
Like
Reply
Sid ******
Anonymous participant 344 I can anyway stay 3 months at a time - so DTV is pointless?
Like
Reply
Greg ********
Anonymous participant 344 Introduced by a previous PM who is known to be at odds with the current PM
Like
Reply
Reply to
Greg ********
Reply
Relaxing********
Oh look another anonomoyous visa agent trying make people with DTV nervous to buy fast track service….shameless
Like
Reply
Sid ******
RelaxingFrog7053 won't this make them lose business? If people learn that dtvs still lead to hassle and may not even work, then they won't bother getting it and the agencies lose money?
Like
Reply
Anonymous ******************
@Sid *****
Lose business? For a little amount of agents only. There is much more to lose with people going for the DTV and paying 10k for 5 years (agent or not).
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous ******************
Reply
Anonymous ******************
RelaxingFrog7053 Sure Mr. (or Miss?) Relaxing Frog. 🐸
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
RelaxingFrog7053 please read the full post before you comment. visa agents also can't write in English this well, I don't think - even with translation (also it's 'anonymous')
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Andi ***********
What the alleged IO said makes no sense at all.
Like
Reply
Sam *********
@Andi **********
cos he's trolling
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Sam ********
clearly didn't read the full post.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Andi **********
yes I agree. why give a visa with a 180 day stamp if really you should leave around 120 days? makes no sense.
Like
Reply
Andi ***********
Anonymous participant you don't have to leave at 120 days.
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Andi **********
yes I know. This is just what he said to me. I understand how the visa works and that this is not stipulated in the actual guidelines. I am just sharing my own experience for information purposes.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous *************
Reply
Anonymous ******************
Yes. It’s a visa for travelling. Thailand. Maybe they need reminding.
Like
Reply
Stephen ********
Anonymous participant 381 doesn't say that anywhere, where did you get that from.

When i applied it simply said if I meet the criteria, in my case a remote worker, I can stay 180 days, extendable to 360, multi entry, for 5 years.

Nothing else stated on website or application.
Like
Reply
Anonymous ******************
@Stephen *******
omg. 😂🇹🇭
Like
Reply
Stephen ********
Anonymous participant 381 oh gawd, not you're going to get all trappy, hiding anno like a little mug🙄

What a 🐓
Like
Reply
Reply to
Stephen ********
Reply
Biff *******
His advice was entirely his own. There’s no official guideline to that effect.
Like
Reply
Anonymous *************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Biff ******
yes exactly - this is how the IOs work - one rule for one and one for another.
Like
Reply
Biff *******
Anonymous participant it wasn’t even a rule, it was his suggestion.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Biff *******
Reply
Andi ***********
@Biff ******
Exactly, no such official advice at all..
Like
Reply
Greg ********
@Andi **********
But IO have discretion just like they did with border bouncers.
Like
Reply
Andi ***********
@Greg *******
Yes, there is discretion but saying the DTV is for 120 days and years 3-5 are more difficult to enter makes no sense.
Like
Reply
Greg ********
@Andi **********
Just have to see how it pans out. Even if the originators (MFA and Thevasin) wanted it to be a sort of permanent resident for 5 years they could not state that explicity as that is not their wheelhouse. That opens the gate to interpretation by the department that controls this wheelhouse ie Immigration. It is a 5 year tourist visa allowing 180 days per entry. People taking up residence on it might not fall within the spirit of the visa if interpreted that way by Immigration. Remember there is politics involved here too and a new sheriff in town.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Greg ********
Reply
Pascal ***********
@Andi **********
it does make some sense. DTV is a tourist visa, not for permanent residency.

I’m curious how strict they will be when people have been living in Thailand nearly full-time for 2-3 years on a DTV.
Like
Reply
Andi ***********
@Pascal **********
The

DTV allows a stay of 180 days not 120. It is a tourist visa but you can stay 5 years. There is no clamp down on people staying 2 or 3 years as they are allowed to providing they follow the rules.
Like
Reply
Greg ********
@Andi **********
I can remember a time when there was no clamp down on 30 day border runners to Poipet. People did it for years in the Noughties.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Greg ********
Reply
Anonymous ******************
Yes you can be questioned and yes there no issue if you can prove you're holding the right visa. And that's for all visas. But "He advised me that DTV holders should only stay for 3-4 months, not the full 6 months each time, as people should use the visa for travel." may become an issue for the ones using it as a full time residency visa. What IOs say isn't always accurate. Time will tell.
Like
Reply
Reply to
Anonymous ******************
Reply
The ask:thailand community, consisting of multiple Q/A groups with over 100,000 members, powers this platform. It is not an official government resource. Our members actively contribute to this resource, and while we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee its complete reliability. Assistance to travelers is provided as a community service.