Can travel history alone be used as evidence of a crime in any 1st World country?
( Do you believe in coincidences? Https://www.thairath.co.th/news/local/bangkok/1494503 )
604
views
0
likes
20
all likes
14
replies
0
images
6
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
The post questions whether travel history can serve as evidence of a crime in first world countries. Comments suggest skepticism about the relevance of the original article link, highlight that being denied entry is not a crime, and note that immigration authorities often operate on suspicion.
Michael ********
Link doesnt work
Zabel ******************
I haven't read it after the link don't work
But don't forget for immigration suspicion are enough to deny a person's entry to the country.
That's the same all over the world
Steven ***************
Considering how many people enter this country a year, the cases of denial would still be very low. And a good chunk of those probably correct.
. I'm sure theres been quite a few "locals" that have benefitted from misusing the system too. Can't have one without the other😉. They just dont like to admit it either.
Zabel ******************
I will throw this in to the discussion is that my opinion is about all this is yes immigration can a unpleasant input in anyone's day.
But the whole subject to why they are cracking down on foreigner is only because visas has been misused by so many foreigner for decades these are the real persons to blame for all these mess
Steven ***************
Zabel Solberg Gynther. Because the way the law is written here, they can and will at their discretion. Add laziness.They take the law literally when they choose to. "Discretion=Up to me"
Ryan *************
Zabel Solberg Gynther its usually always denied due to not enough funds when the person does, why? Its the easiest for the io to fill the form in for, others are suspicion of looking for work when they have visited once before or have been here a while as a tourist, long stay tourist = looking for work? No. I think the issue is no proof of being suspicious, sure most countries would have a reason like tools, or paper work regarding possible jobs etc, here its just whatever the io comes up woth regardless of reality which is the problem, if they going to denie people atleast do it on valid grounds and not whats easiest to do the paper work for, and atleast back it up aka some avidence leading to suspicion? another further issue, the form which visitors are supposed to sign for denial are written in Thai, so essentially they have no idea what they are signing, any other country youd have an English form it would be translated.I certainly wouldn't like to sign a form which I cannot read it could basically say yes I am looking for work I will allow the IO to ban me forever, that wouldn't be fair given its in Thai... visitors and people in immigration detention are allowed to dispute the case or reason for denial but given its written in Thai that would be pretty hard to initiate any legal reps or understanding, its not fair and should be translated.
P.s no need for the personal digs/insults not going to make much progress with that
Zabel ******************
Tyson Dewees
Not really hate Pattaya and have single floor house and don't really have any mental health issues so couldn't be more wrong
Can you find that suspicion is enough to deny entry in the immigration act...? Or is that just something you heard or read from someone who acts like they know something? 🤣
Reply to
Ryan ******
Reply
Steven ***************
Being denied entry to a country isn't a crime... so what's your point and agenda?