What documents do forex traders need to prove their status for the DTV visa in Thailand?

September 3, 2024
20 days ago
As a trader what document are you submitting to prove digital nomad or freelance.... I am trying as a full time forex trader I don't know if we can submit our trading account statement as proof...

If anyone had tried and got thru in getting DTV visa as a stock/forex trader pls share your experience

TIA
462
views
2
likes
15
all likes
8
replies
0
images
3
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
The author is inquiring about the necessary documentation for forex traders to qualify for the DTV visa in Thailand. They are unsure if a trading account statement suffices as proof of income for a digital nomad or freelancer status. Comments seek clarity on whether being registered as a freelancer or having a registered company is essential and express skepticism about the validity of trading account statements as qualifying documents.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
John **********
Do you have a registered company or are registered as a freelancer in your home country?
Vijayananda **********************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@John *********
just trading on my own and their is no gov body or private firm where we can register, it just the trading broker account... that why I am not sure if this will be accepted....

Thx for u r response ..
John **********
@Vijayananda *********************
do you pay tax? I've seen people using their tax return as verification
Vijayananda **********************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@John *********
yes , I pay good amount of tax, that is what I thought should work, I have sent email to thai embassy for clarification, if they confirm will apply...
Joel ********
@Vijayananda *********************
maybe send to Dept of Foreign Affairs as they are the one issuing the visa. Immagration handles once your at the border of in country.
Mario *****
@Vijayananda *********************
please update me , im in the same situation
Vijayananda **********************
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Mario ****
sure, still waiting for response
Graham *******
I do not think that qualifies.