I am planning on going to Thailand in November for 5 months, I am 62 and my wife is Thai, I am married currently in Ohio. I usually get an OA visa but now I don't have medical insurance since I am retired now and I had international coverage. I thought about a family visa and leave at 90 days and return. I still would like an OA visa but I don't need a years coverage. Since I would have a year visa would they make me keep insurance for the duration of the visa or can I show I'm leaving in 5 months? What is my best route for insurance, cost wise? Or is the family visa better and find insurance for 5 months?
TLDR : Answer Summary
The user is considering options for a 5-month stay in Thailand, facing challenges regarding the OA visa due to lack of medical insurance. Comments suggest that the OA visa requires proof of one year of insurance, and alternative solutions include the Non-O visa based on marriage, which can be extended for an additional 60 days without requiring long-term insurance. Recommendations for affordable insurance options, like Pacific Cross, are provided.
NON-O RETIREMENT VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
- Go to the Retirement Visa Section for information on requirements, including age restrictions, financial requirements, and necessary documentation.
- For immediate assistance, contact Thai Visa Centre directly via LINE at @ThaiVisaCentre or Email them.
- Explore recent discussions by using the Non-O Retirement Visa tag in the search box at the top of the page.
- Join the Thai Visa Advice Facebook Group to ask your questions, and get advice from others.