Answered6 years ago

How does the online 90-day reporting process work in Thailand?

90-Day Reporting Thai Immigration Visa Compliance Online Reporting Expat Experiences

Dan *********

asked Sep 28, 2020

2.1k

views

replies

likes

Hi All

Just did my 90 days on line for the second time. Brilliant! The form virtually filled itself in with the information held from the first submission. Took all of 2 mins. seriously impressed.

Answer summary

The user shares a positive experience regarding the recent online submission of their 90-day report in Thailand, noting its simplicity and speed. Comments include reminders that filing online does not equate to approval, and a question about the approval turnaround time, which is later confirmed to be quick with an approval email received shortly after.

9 repliesnewest first

Click comment and we will ask for your email, then OTP, then name.

Dan *********

Ok , approved email received at 11:49. Amazing!!!!

6 years ago

Dan *********

@Tod ********

Understood Tod, waiting now for the approval email, how long is the current turnaround, any idea?

6 years ago

Frederick *********

@Dan ********

I did mine last week and it was approved the following day.

6 years ago

Dan *********

Thanks Tod

6 years ago

Tod *********

anywhere from a few minutes to a couple days :/ just check the status of it later this afternoon..

6 years ago

Tod *********

remember just FILING a 90 day report online and getting a pending status is NOT getting it approved. :O

you still need it to be approved, then go back in and print the next appointment receipt that you carry in your passport :)

6 years ago

Nick *******

@Tod ********

the next appointment receipt must be printed or would just having it saved on your phone be enough?

6 years ago

Tod *********

@Nick ******

, the requirement is you carry it in your passport. That's how it's been done for years. you definitely need a hard copy when you go to apply for your next extension

6 years ago

Nick *******

@Tod ********

understood, thanks for the clarification.

6 years ago