I know that currently we can get a 60 day visa on arrival. Assuming that they change that back to a 30 day stamp …if I were to fly into Thailand and get the visa on arrival, extend it for 30 days….leave Thailand for a month and return to do the same thing again, do you think this would lead to a problem with immigration? The rest of the year I would be outside of Thailand exploring other countries. I would like to be in Thailand for those specific months (April May, July, August) because it’s low season.
TLDR : Answer Summary
The discussion revolves around a traveler considering a strategy to enter Thailand, stay for 60 days on a visa exemption, leave for a month, and then re-enter. Several comments suggest this behavior resembles normal tourism and should not raise immigration issues, even if visa rules change back to a 30-day stamp. One user mentions already employing a similar strategy without complications. There are some concerns over Thailand's climate during the chosen months, but overall, the consensus is that the outlined plan appears acceptable under current immigration policies.